Skip to contentScholarGate
LibraryBookshelfDeskReview StudioAssistant
Sign in
On this page
IntuitionHow it worksWhen to use itStrengths & limitationsCommon pitfallsApplicationsFrequently asked🔒 Read the full methodSourcesRelated methods
Cite this pageSpotted an issue on this page? Report or suggest a fix →
Home›Text mining›Knowledge Graph Construction from Text
Process / pipeline

Knowledge Graph Construction from Text

Also known as: knowledge graph, KG construction, Bilgi Grafiği Oluşturma (Knowledge Graph)

Knowledge graph construction is a text-mining pipeline that turns unstructured text into a structured graph of entities and the relations between them. Drawing on the synthesis of Hogan et al. (2021) and the relational-machine-learning review of Nickel et al. (2016), it represents knowledge as nodes (entities such as people, places, organisations) connected by labelled edges (relations), and serves semantic search, recommendation systems, and reasoning.

ScholarGate
  1. Process / pipeline
  2. v1
  3. 2 Sources
  4. PUBLISHED
Cite this page →
Tools & resources
Download slides
Learn & explore

Read the full method

Members only

Sign in with a free account to read this section.

Sign in

Method map

The neighbourhood of related methods — select a node to explore.

Knowledge Graph Construction
Entity LinkingNamed Entity RecognitionRelation ExtractionCommonsense ReasoningRetrieval-Augmented Gene…

When to use it

Use knowledge graph construction when you have text data and want to expose the entities and relations it contains as a structured, queryable graph for semantic search, recommendation, or reasoning. It assumes that named-entity-recognition and relation-extraction results are available, and an entity-linking infrastructure is recommended to merge duplicate mentions. A corpus of at least around 30 documents is the practical minimum for a useful graph.

Strengths & limitations

Strengths
  • Turns unstructured text into an explicit, queryable structure of entities and relations.
  • Supports semantic search, recommendation systems, and reasoning over connected facts.
  • Surfaces relationships that span multiple sentences or documents, not just single statements.
Limitations
  • Quality depends entirely on the upstream named-entity-recognition and relation-extraction results being available and accurate.
  • Without entity linking, duplicate and ambiguous entities fragment the graph.
  • Building and maintaining the pipeline is moderately demanding and not a one-step procedure.

Frequently asked

What is a knowledge graph?

It is a structured representation of knowledge as a graph: entities such as people, places, and organisations are nodes, and the relations between them are labelled edges. It captures facts as connected subject-relation-object structures rather than as free text.

What inputs does the construction pipeline need?

It assumes named-entity-recognition and relation-extraction results are already available, since those supply the nodes and edges. An entity-linking infrastructure is recommended so that different mentions of the same thing map to one node.

Why is entity linking important?

Entity linking disambiguates mentions and merges duplicates so that every reference to the same real-world entity collapses onto a single node. Without it, the graph fragments into duplicate and ambiguous nodes that weaken search, recommendation, and reasoning.

What is a knowledge graph used for?

Once built, the graph supports semantic search, recommendation systems, and reasoning — letting a system follow links between entities to answer questions and surface relationships that no single sentence states directly.

Sources

  1. Hogan, A. et al. (2021). Knowledge Graphs. ACM Computing Surveys, 54(4), 1-37. DOI: 10.1145/3447772 ↗
  2. Nickel, M. et al. (2016). A Review of Relational Machine Learning for Knowledge Graphs. Proceedings of the IEEE, 104(1), 11-33. DOI: 10.1109/JPROC.2015.2483592 ↗

How to cite this page

ScholarGate. (2026, June 1). Knowledge Graph Construction from Text. ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/en/text-mining/knowledge-graph-nlp

Related methods

Entity LinkingNamed Entity RecognitionRelation Extraction

Which method?

Set this method beside its closest kin and read them side by side — the library lays the books on the table; the choice is yours.

  • Entity LinkingText mining↔ compare
  • Named Entity RecognitionText mining↔ compare
  • Relation ExtractionText mining↔ compare
Compare side by side →

Referenced by

Commonsense ReasoningRetrieval-Augmented Generation

Similar methods

Relation ExtractionInformation ExtractionKnowledge Graph AnalysisOpen Information ExtractionEntity LinkingDirected Knowledge Graph AnalysisMultilayer Knowledge Graph AnalysisKeyword Extraction

Related reference concepts

Information ExtractionInformation ExtractionSemantic Networks and OntologiesNatural Language Processing in Clinical DocumentationKnowledge Representation and ReasoningNatural Language Processing

Spotted an issue on this page? Report or suggest a fix →

ScholarGate — Knowledge Graph Construction (Knowledge Graph Construction from Text). Retrieved 2026-07-21 from https://scholargate.app/en/text-mining/knowledge-graph-nlp · Dataset: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20539026
Quick facts
Type
Structured knowledge representation pipeline
Input
Unstructured text
Output
Graph of entities (nodes) and relations (edges)
BuildingBlocks
Named-entity recognition, relation extraction, entity linking
MinSample
30
Related methods
Entity LinkingNamed Entity RecognitionRelation Extraction
ScholarGate

A content-first reference library for research methods — what each one is, how it works, and where it comes from.

Open data (CC-BY)

Explore

  • Library
  • Search the library…
  • Browse by field
  • Fields
  • Journey
  • Compare
  • Which method?

Reference

  • Subjects
  • Atlas
  • Glossary
  • Methodology
  • Philosophy

Your tools

  • Bookshelf
  • Desk
  • Chat

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Contact
  • Suggest a method

Entries are compiled from published sources for reference. Verifying the accuracy and suitability of any information for your own use remains your responsibility.

© 2026 ScholarGate · A research-method reference library
  • Privacy
  • Cookies
  • Terms
  • Delete account