Jackknife Resampling Estimation
Also known as: delete-one jackknife, leave-one-out jackknife, Jackknife Yeniden Örnekleme
Jackknife estimation is a classical resampling technique that computes the bias and variance of a statistical estimator by systematically leaving out one observation at a time and re-computing the statistic on each reduced sample. Introduced by Maurice Quenouille in 1956 for bias correction and extended by John Tukey in 1958 who coined the name, it is the historical predecessor of the bootstrap and remains analytically tractable for smooth, differentiable estimators.
Read the full method
Sign in with a free account to read this section.
Method map
The neighbourhood of related methods — select a node to explore.
When to use it
Use jackknife estimation when you want a computationally simple, analytically motivated way to assess the bias and variance of a smooth estimator applied to an independent random sample. It is particularly useful when you have a single dataset and no natural way to obtain repeated samples. At least 10 observations are recommended. Assumptions are that the observations are mutually independent — for dependent data (panel or clustered samples) a delete-d or grouped jackknife is required — and that the estimator is a smooth function of the data, so that leaving out one observation changes it continuously. For non-smooth estimators such as the median, the standard bootstrap is generally more reliable.
Strengths & limitations
- Analytically tractable: bias and variance formulas are explicit, requiring no distributional assumptions beyond smoothness of the estimator.
- Computationally inexpensive relative to the bootstrap: only n re-computations are needed instead of hundreds or thousands.
- Historically foundational and well understood: over 60 years of theoretical development underpin its behaviour.
- Valid across a wide range of estimator types as long as the estimator is smooth and the data are independent.
- Fails for non-smooth estimators such as the median or sample quantiles, where leave-one-out replicates can be degenerate.
- Less general than the bootstrap: the bootstrap provides higher-order accuracy and handles a broader class of statistics and data structures.
- Assumes independent observations; clustered, time-series, or hierarchical data violate this and require grouped or block variants.
- With very small samples the leave-one-out replicates are highly dependent on each other, which can distort variance estimates.
Frequently asked
How does the jackknife differ from the bootstrap?
Both are resampling methods for estimating uncertainty, but they operate differently. The jackknife uses n deterministic leave-one-out sub-samples, making it exact and repeatable; the bootstrap draws B random samples of size n with replacement, typically using B = 1000 or more. The bootstrap is more general — it handles non-smooth estimators and provides higher-order accuracy — but the jackknife is faster when n is large and B would need to be very large to match precision.
Can jackknife be used for hypothesis testing?
Jackknife is primarily a tool for bias correction and uncertainty quantification, not a hypothesis test in the classical sense. You can construct a confidence interval from the jackknife standard error and use it to assess whether an estimator is significantly different from a hypothesised value, but a formal p-value is not a standard output of the jackknife procedure.
Why does the jackknife fail for the median?
The median is a non-smooth estimator: removing one observation can shift the median discontinuously, especially when n is odd. The leave-one-out replicates then have very little variability (they alternate between a small set of values), causing the jackknife variance formula to drastically underestimate the true variance. For quantile estimators, the bootstrap with a sufficiently large B is the recommended alternative.
What is the delete-d jackknife?
The delete-d jackknife generalises the leave-one-out method by removing d observations at a time instead of just one. This produces C(n, d) sub-samples and is useful for dependent data structures or when n is large and d-deletion provides more stable variance estimates. Setting d proportional to n can recover consistency for non-smooth estimators that the delete-1 jackknife cannot handle.
Sources
- Quenouille, M. H. (1956). Notes on Bias in Estimation. Biometrika, 43(3/4), 353–360. DOI: 10.1093/biomet/43.3-4.353 ↗
- Tukey, J. W. (1958). Bias and Confidence in Not Quite Large Samples. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 29(2), 614. link ↗
How to cite this page
ScholarGate. (2026, June 1). Jackknife Resampling Estimation. ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/en/statistics/jackknife-estimation
Which method?
Set this method beside its closest kin and read them side by side — the library lays the books on the table; the choice is yours.
- CROSS-VALIDATIONDecision-making↔ compare
- MONTE-CARLO-SIMULATIONDecision-making↔ compare
- Permutation TestStatistics↔ compare