Skip to contentScholarGate
LibraryBookshelfDeskReview StudioAssistant
Sign in
On this page
IntuitionHow it worksWhen to use itStrengths & limitationsCommon pitfallsApplicationsFrequently asked🔒 Read the full methodSourcesRelated methods
Cite this pageSpotted an issue on this page? Report or suggest a fix →
Home›Statistics›Influence Diagnostics (Cook's Distance, DFFITS, Leverage)
Regression model

Influence Diagnostics (Cook's Distance, DFFITS, Leverage)

Regression Influence Diagnostics (Cook's Distance, DFFITS, Leverage) · Also known as: Cook's distance, DFFITS, leverage, influential observation detection, regression diagnostics, Etki Tanılamaları (Cook's D, DFFITS, Leverage)

Influence diagnostics are a family of post-fit measures that quantify how much each single observation affects a fitted regression. Cook's distance was introduced by R. Dennis Cook in 1977, with leverage and DFFITS formalised by Belsley, Kuh and Welsch in 1980, to flag the observations that most strongly pull the estimated coefficients.

ScholarGate
  1. Regression model
  2. v1
  3. 2 Sources
  4. PUBLISHED
Cite this page →
Tools & resources
Download slides
Learn & explore

Read the full method

Members only

Sign in with a free account to read this section.

Sign in

Method map

The neighbourhood of related methods — select a node to explore.

Influence Diagnostics
MAD EstimationOLS RegressionQuantile RegressionRidge RegressionRobust RegressionRobust Factor AnalysisWinsorized Estimation

When to use it

Use influence diagnostics after fitting any linear regression, once residuals and leverage can be computed, to check whether the conclusions rest on a handful of observations. They suit continuous outcomes and need a working regression model plus a reasonable sample of at least about 20 observations. They are a screening step rather than a final model, and in very small samples or with several clustered high-leverage points the standard measures can become unreliable.

Strengths & limitations

Strengths
  • Pinpoints exactly which observations drive the regression, observation by observation.
  • Distribution-free: requires no normality assumption, only a fitted model with computable residuals.
  • Cook's distance, DFFITS and leverage give complementary views (overall influence, single-fit influence, predictor-space position) of the same data.
Limitations
  • In very small samples (n < 20) Cook's distance and leverage values become unreliable, so simpler outlier detection is preferable.
  • When several high-leverage points cluster together they can mask one another, hiding their joint influence from the standard one-at-a-time measures.
  • Diagnostics flag influential points but do not by themselves decide whether to keep, transform, or remove them.

Frequently asked

What counts as a large Cook's distance?

A common rule of thumb flags observations with Cook's distance above 4/n, while values near or above 1 are treated as clearly influential. Thresholds are guides, not verdicts: a flagged point should be inspected, not automatically deleted.

What is the difference between leverage and influence?

Leverage measures how unusual an observation's predictor values are, regardless of its outcome. Influence (Cook's distance, DFFITS) measures how much the fitted model actually changes when the point is removed, combining leverage with the size of the residual. A high-leverage point is only influential if it also sits far from the fitted line.

Should I delete observations flagged as influential?

Not automatically. Flagging is a screening step: investigate whether the point is a data error, a genuine but rare case, or a sign of model misspecification. If influential points are pervasive, a robust regression method is usually a better response than deletion.

Do these diagnostics require normally distributed errors?

No. The measures are computed directly from the fitted residuals and the hat matrix and need no normality assumption; they only require a regression model from which residuals and leverage can be calculated.

Sources

  1. Cook, R. D. (1977). Detection of Influential Observations in Linear Regression. Technometrics, 19(1), 15-18. DOI: 10.1080/00401706.1977.10489493 ↗
  2. Belsley, D. A., Kuh, E., & Welsch, R. E. (1980). Regression Diagnostics: Identifying Influential Data and Sources of Collinearity. Wiley. ISBN: 978-0471058564

How to cite this page

ScholarGate. (2026, June 1). Regression Influence Diagnostics (Cook's Distance, DFFITS, Leverage). ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/en/statistics/influence-diagnostics

Related methods

MAD EstimationOLS RegressionQuantile RegressionRidge RegressionRobust Regression

Which method?

Set this method beside its closest kin and read them side by side — the library lays the books on the table; the choice is yours.

  • MAD EstimationStatistics↔ compare
  • OLS RegressionEconometrics↔ compare
  • Quantile RegressionEconometrics↔ compare
  • Ridge RegressionMachine learning↔ compare
  • Robust RegressionStatistics↔ compare
Compare side by side →

Referenced by

Robust Factor AnalysisWinsorized Estimation

Similar methods

Robust RegressionRobust Linear RegressionVariance Inflation FactorRobust Multiple linear regressionRobust Mahalanobis DistanceCondition IndexRobust Simple linear regressionHuber Regression

Related reference concepts

Model Selection and DiagnosticsMultiple Linear RegressionRegression and CorrelationMultivariate Multiple RegressionSimple Linear RegressionMultivariate Regression

Spotted an issue on this page? Report or suggest a fix →

ScholarGate — Influence Diagnostics (Regression Influence Diagnostics (Cook's Distance, DFFITS, Leverage)). Retrieved 2026-07-20 from https://scholargate.app/en/statistics/influence-diagnostics · Dataset: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20539026
Quick facts
Originator
R. Dennis Cook (Cook's distance); Belsley, Kuh & Welsch (DFFITS, leverage)
Year
1977
Type
Regression diagnostic
AppliesTo
Fitted linear regression model
Outcome
continuous
MinSample
20
Related methods
MAD EstimationOLS RegressionQuantile RegressionRidge RegressionRobust Regression
ScholarGate

A content-first reference library for research methods — what each one is, how it works, and where it comes from.

Open data (CC-BY)

Explore

  • Library
  • Search the library…
  • Browse by field
  • Fields
  • Journey
  • Compare
  • Which method?

Reference

  • Subjects
  • Atlas
  • Glossary
  • Methodology
  • Philosophy

Your tools

  • Bookshelf
  • Desk
  • Chat

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Contact
  • Suggest a method

Entries are compiled from published sources for reference. Verifying the accuracy and suitability of any information for your own use remains your responsibility.

© 2026 ScholarGate · A research-method reference library
  • Privacy
  • Cookies
  • Terms
  • Delete account