Skip to contentScholarGate
LibraryBookshelfDeskReview StudioAssistant
Sign in
On this page
IntuitionHow it worksWhen to use itStrengths & limitationsCommon pitfallsApplicationsFrequently asked🔒 Read the full methodSourcesRelated methods
Cite this pageSpotted an issue on this page? Report or suggest a fix →
Home›Soft Computing›Possibility Theory
Machine learningUncertainty theory

Possibility Theory

Also known as: Fuzzy Possibility Theory, Possibilistic Reasoning, Olasılık Teorisi (Bulanık), Possibility Distribution Theory

Possibility Theory is a mathematical framework for representing and reasoning under uncertainty, introduced by Lotfi Zadeh in 1978 and systematically developed by Didier Dubois and Henri Prade in their 1988 monograph. It uses possibility distributions — functions assigning a degree in [0,1] to each element of a universe — to encode what is plausible or consistent with available information, complementing probability theory for situations where data is scarce or knowledge is imprecise.

ScholarGate
  1. Machine learning
  2. v1
  3. 2 Sources
  4. PUBLISHED
Cite this page →
Tools & resources
Download slides
Learn & explore

Read the full method

Members only

Sign in with a free account to read this section.

Sign in

Method map

The neighbourhood of related methods — select a node to explore.

Possibility Theory
Dempster-Shafer TheoryGranular ComputingImprecise Probability

When to use it

Use Possibility Theory when uncertainty stems from imprecision, incomplete knowledge, or qualitative expert judgment rather than statistical variability. It is well-suited for decision support, knowledge representation, and rule-based systems where probability distributions cannot be reliably estimated. Key assumptions include the availability of a meaningful universe of discourse and a normalizable possibility distribution. Limitations include difficulty in aggregating possibility measures across independent sources and weaker axiomatic foundations compared to probability. Alternatives include Dempster-Shafer theory for evidence combination, or imprecise probability when partial probability bounds are available.

Strengths & limitations

Strengths
  • Handles imprecise, incomplete, and qualitative information without requiring precise probability estimates
  • Closely aligned with natural language expressions and fuzzy set representations
  • Computationally tractable: possibility and necessity measures reduce to supremum and infimum operations
  • Provides a principled duality between possibility (plausibility) and necessity (certainty)
Limitations
  • Does not satisfy additivity, making it unsuitable as a direct replacement for probability in statistical inference
  • Combination of possibility distributions from multiple independent sources lacks a universally accepted rule
  • Normalization assumption requires at least one fully possible value, which may be difficult to justify in some domains
  • Limited empirical calibration tools compared to frequentist or Bayesian probability frameworks

Frequently asked

How does Possibility Theory differ from Probability Theory?

Probability measures the frequency or degree of belief in outcomes under a closed-world assumption and satisfies additivity. Possibility Theory abandons additivity in favor of a max-based framework, making it suitable for open-world settings where information is incomplete or qualitative. A possibility of 1 means an event is consistent with knowledge, not that it is certain to occur.

Can Possibility Theory and Probability Theory be used together?

Yes. Possibility distributions can be transformed into probability intervals via the probability-possibility consistency principle, and hybrid models exist that combine possibilistic and probabilistic layers. Dubois and Prade describe formal relationships between the two frameworks, enabling their joint use when partial statistical information is supplemented by expert qualitative knowledge.

What is the difference between possibility and necessity measures?

The possibility measure Π(A) reflects the maximum consistency of event A with available information — how plausible A is. The necessity measure N(A) reflects the minimum degree to which A must hold given what is known — how certain A is. They are duals: N(A) = 1 − Π(complement of A). An event can be fully possible yet have zero necessity if its negation is also possible.

Sources

  1. Dubois, D., & Prade, H. (1988). Possibility Theory: An Approach to Computerized Processing of Uncertainty. Plenum Press. ISBN: 978-0-306-42520-2
  2. Zadeh, L. A. (1978). Fuzzy sets as a basis for a theory of possibility. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 1(1), 3–28. DOI: 10.1016/0165-0114(78)90029-5 ↗

How to cite this page

ScholarGate. (2026, June 2). Possibility Theory. ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/en/soft-computing/possibility-theory

Related methods

Dempster-Shafer TheoryGranular ComputingImprecise Probability

Which method?

Set this method beside its closest kin and read them side by side — the library lays the books on the table; the choice is yours.

  • Dempster-Shafer TheorySoft Computing↔ compare
  • Granular ComputingSoft Computing↔ compare
  • Imprecise ProbabilitySoft Computing↔ compare
Compare side by side →

Referenced by

Imprecise Probability

Similar methods

Imprecise ProbabilityDempster-Shafer TheorySoft Set TheoryThree-Way DecisionsDempster-Shafer FusionGranular ComputingBelief Rule BaseFuzzy Cognitive Maps

Related reference concepts

Reasoning Under UncertaintyMany-Valued and Fuzzy LogicsDecision Theory and UtilitySubjective and Objective ProbabilityKnowledge Representation and ReasoningBayesian Inference Foundations

Spotted an issue on this page? Report or suggest a fix →

ScholarGate — Possibility Theory (Possibility Theory). Retrieved 2026-07-20 from https://scholargate.app/en/soft-computing/possibility-theory · Dataset: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20539026
Quick facts
Originator
Lotfi Zadeh; Didier Dubois & Henri Prade
Year
1988
Type
Uncertainty quantification framework
Subfamily
Uncertainty theory
Key Construct
Possibility and necessity measures
Representation
Possibility distribution over a universe of discourse
Related methods
Dempster-Shafer TheoryGranular ComputingImprecise Probability
ScholarGate

A content-first reference library for research methods — what each one is, how it works, and where it comes from.

Open data (CC-BY)

Explore

  • Library
  • Search the library…
  • Browse by field
  • Fields
  • Journey
  • Compare
  • Which method?

Reference

  • Subjects
  • Atlas
  • Glossary
  • Methodology
  • Philosophy

Your tools

  • Bookshelf
  • Desk
  • Chat

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Contact
  • Suggest a method

Entries are compiled from published sources for reference. Verifying the accuracy and suitability of any information for your own use remains your responsibility.

© 2026 ScholarGate · A research-method reference library
  • Privacy
  • Cookies
  • Terms
  • Delete account