Assessment of Life Habits — Comprehensive Participation in Daily and Social Roles
Assessment of Life Habits (LIFE-H) · Also known as: LIFE-H, AALH
The Assessment of Life Habits (LIFE-H) is a comprehensive, interview-based measure that evaluates participation in 11 key life domains—from basic self-care and nutrition to work, recreation, and community engagement. Developed in Quebec by Fougeyrollas, Noreau, and colleagues, LIFE-H operationalizes the ICF concept of 'participation' through a detailed assessment of how individuals accomplish (or struggle with) the habits and roles essential to life in their community.
Read the full method
Sign in with a free account to read this section.
Method map
The neighbourhood of related methods — select a node to explore.
When to use it
LIFE-H is indicated for (1) comprehensive rehabilitation outcome assessment in complex conditions (spinal cord injury, TBI, multiple sclerosis, stroke); (2) individualized goal-setting and progress monitoring (identifies which habits/domains are rehabilitation priorities); (3) community reintegration evaluation post-discharge; (4) chronic disease management (arthritis, COPD, chronic pain: how disease impacts everyday life); (5) aging and geriatric assessment (capability vs. actual participation in community-dwelling older adults); (6) research on participation in disability populations. Strength: captures actual life participation, not just capacity. Limitation: requires 60–90 minute interview by trained assessor; not feasible for screening or time-limited settings. Most used in rehabilitation and chronic disease management in Quebec, Canada, and increasingly in Europe and internationally.
Strengths & limitations
- Comprehensive life-roles assessment: 11 domains cover the full spectrum of daily and social habits, not just mobility or self-care. Reflects real-world participation in meaningful activities.
- Dual-dimensional scoring: participation level + assistance level separately captures both 'what is accomplished' and 'how dependent the person is,' enabling nuanced understanding of functional status.
- Interview-based: semi-structured format allows exploration of context, barriers, and adaptive strategies. Richer information than questionnaire responses.
- Individualized: assessor can probe specific domains relevant to the person (e.g., detailed work history for employed person, recreation for active athlete). Flexible coverage based on life roles.
- Strong psychometrics: internal consistency (Cronbach α 0.85–0.92), test-retest reliability (ICC 0.80–0.90), construct validity demonstrated in SCI, TBI, arthritis, MS populations.
- Goal-aligned: directly informs rehabilitation goal-setting; if Recreation or Work scores are low, those become targets for intervention.
- Cross-cultural validation: validated in French, English, Spanish, German, and used internationally.
- Assessor training required: semi-structured interview demands trained personnel; not feasible for untrained staff or remote administration. Higher cost than self-report questionnaires.
- Time-intensive: 60–90 minute administration is lengthy; not suitable for busy clinics, population screening, or frequent repeated measures.
- Interviewer bias: subjective scoring (particularly participation 0–9 scale) may vary based on assessor's probing, interpretation, and rapport with respondent. Standardization training is essential.
- Literacy and language not critical, but cultural assumptions embedded: concepts like 'recreation,' 'work,' 'community life' may not translate identically across cultures. Context matters.
- Limited normative data: fewer large normative samples compared to brief questionnaires (WHODAS, CIQ). Comparison to literature means or condition-specific baselines is needed.
- Not validated in acute phase: designed for chronic/stable phases when daily patterns are established; not appropriate for acute hospitalization or early post-injury.
- Proxy scoring is less validated: while proxy interviews can be conducted, there is less empirical support for proxy-self agreement compared to tools like IPA or WHODAS.
Frequently asked
How is LIFE-H different from WHODAS 2.0?
WHODAS 2.0 is a quick (10–15 min) self-report questionnaire measuring functional limitation (difficulty with tasks). LIFE-H is a 60–90 minute trained-assessor interview measuring actual participation in life habits. WHODAS is designed for broad epidemiological use and is universal; LIFE-H is more detailed and designed for in-depth rehabilitation assessment. WHODAS uses fixed items; LIFE-H is flexible/semi-structured. In clinical rehabilitation, both are valuable: WHODAS for rapid outcome tracking, LIFE-H for comprehensive goal-setting.
Can LIFE-H be administered via telephone or self-report?
Telephone administration by trained assessor is feasible but requires experienced interviewer to probe adequately without visual cues. Self-report questionnaire versions exist but are not as extensively validated as the interview. For high-fidelity assessment, in-person interview is preferred. Shorter modular versions are under development to reduce time burden.
What is a clinically meaningful change in LIFE-H participation score?
Approximately 1–2 points on the 0–9 participation scale per domain is clinically meaningful (representing move from 'major difficulty' to 'moderate difficulty,' for example). Across domains, a mean change of >1 point is substantial. Time frame matters: 3–6 months may show greater change; 1 month may show minimal. Use change +domain profile (which improved, which remained stable) to interpret.
Is LIFE-H suitable for acute rehabilitation (inpatient, first weeks post-injury)?
LIFE-H is not ideal for acute phase (0–4 weeks) when daily patterns are disrupted and person is still hospitalized. It is most valid in chronic/community phase (6+ weeks) when routines have begun to stabilize. However, LIFE-H can be used pre-injury (caregiver recall of pre-injury habits) as a baseline for comparison with post-injury outcomes.
How should I score LIFE-H if someone did not do an activity before their injury?
Score based on current participation, not pre-injury baseline. If someone did not work pre-injury (retired, student), their current Work score reflects their current situation. If their pre-injury participation was very different, document that in narrative notes and use relative change as outcome (e.g., 'Returned to 75% of pre-injury community participation level').
What is the minimum number of domains to assess in LIFE-H?
All 11 domains are part of the full LIFE-H. If time is limited, some assessors score only priority domains (e.g., Work + Recreation for employed young adult, Personal care + Nutrition + Housing for older adult with ADL focus), but this reduces comprehensiveness. Shorter modular versions are in development; consult the developers for validated brief versions.
Is LIFE-H free to use?
Yes, LIFE-H is in the public domain and may be used without license fees. Assessor training (available through CRIR or certified trainers) is highly recommended but not legally required. Training typically 1–2 days of workshops. Always cite the original Fougeyrollas & Noreau (2002) source.
Can LIFE-H be used in proxy format (caregiver or clinician report)?
Proxy interviews can be conducted (caregiver or clinician observes and reports on the person's participation), but self-report is preferred when cognitively capable. Proxy-self agreement is moderate (r 0.60–0.75) depending on domain; caregivers may overestimate or underestimate based on their exposure. Always note whether score is self or proxy.
Sources
- Noreau, L., Fougeyrollas, P., & Blouin, M. (1992). Revision of the LIFE-H measurement instrument: conceptual structure and items content. Journal of Outcome Measurement, 2(4), 242–268. link ↗
- Fougeyrollas, P., & Noreau, L. (2002). The Influence of Human Development, Social Structure and Culture on the Type of Environmental and Personal Determinants to the Genesis of Handicap. In: WHO International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). WHO. link ↗
How to cite this page
ScholarGate. (2026, June 3). Assessment of Life Habits (LIFE-H). ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/en/rehabilitation-science/assessment-life-habits
Which method?
Set this method beside its closest kin and read them side by side — the library lays the books on the table; the choice is yours.
- Community Integration QuestionnaireRehabilitation Science↔ compare
- Impact on Participation and AutonomyRehabilitation Science↔ compare
- Participation ScaleRehabilitation Science↔ compare
- Reintegration to Normal Living IndexRehabilitation Science↔ compare
- WHODAS 2.0Rehabilitation Science↔ compare