Skip to contentScholarGate
LibraryBookshelfDeskReview StudioAssistant
Sign in
On this page
IntuitionHow it worksWhen to use itStrengths & limitationsCommon pitfallsApplicationsFrequently asked🔒 Read the full methodSourcesRelated methods
Cite this pageSpotted an issue on this page? Report or suggest a fix →
Home›Quantum Computing›KKR Method
Machine learningMultiple Scattering Method

KKR Method

Korringa-Kohn-Rostoker Method · Also known as: KKR, multiple scattering

The Korringa-Kohn-Rostoker (KKR) method is a powerful multiple-scattering approach for calculating electronic band structures and properties of periodic and disordered solids. Developed in the late 1940s, KKR treats electrons as scattering from atomic potentials in a muffin-tin geometry, enabling efficient calculations for both crystalline and amorphous systems.

ScholarGate
  1. Machine learning
  2. v1
  3. 3 Sources
  4. PUBLISHED
Cite this page →
Tools & resources
Download slides
Learn & explore

Read the full method

Members only

Sign in with a free account to read this section.

Sign in

Method map

The neighbourhood of related methods — select a node to explore.

KKR Method
Density Functional TheoryHartree-Fock MethodTight-Binding Model

When to use it

KKR is suitable for periodic systems, especially those with complex structures or multiple scattering. It is particularly powerful for disordered alloys via the coherent potential approximation (CPA).

Strengths & limitations

Strengths
  • Efficient for large unit cells and complex structures.
  • Naturally handles disorder via CPA without supercells.
  • Excellent for magnetic systems and spin-dependent properties.
  • Green's function formalism provides flexibility for defects.
  • Well-suited for transport and response properties.
Limitations
  • Muffin-tin approximation breaks down for highly localized electrons.
  • Assumes spherical symmetry inside MT spheres; may be inaccurate near atoms.
  • Requires careful choice of MT sphere radii and interstitial parameters.
  • Less transparent than plane-wave DFT for visualization and intuition.
  • Implementation more complex; fewer commercial packages.

Frequently asked

What is the muffin-tin approximation and when is it valid?

MT approximation assumes spherically symmetric potential inside non-overlapping spheres centered on atoms, with constant potential outside. It is valid for spherically symmetric charge distributions; it breaks down for anisotropic bonds or rough potentials.

How does KKR handle disorder?

The coherent potential approximation (CPA) replaces a random alloy with a single effective medium, allowing disorder to be included without supercells. CPA is very efficient but assumes short-range correlations are weak.

What are structure constants?

Structure constants encode how an electron wave scattered from one atom propagates to and rescatters from another, depending on geometry. They generalize the free-electron Green's function to the crystal structure.

Is KKR better than DFT for disordered systems?

For disordered systems, KKR+CPA is more efficient than supercell DFT, allowing for realistic disorder without massive computational cost. For ordered systems, DFT is more widely used and flexible.

What basis functions are used in KKR?

Inside MT spheres, solutions of the radial Schrödinger equation (partial waves) are used. In the interstitial, plane waves or other basis sets can be employed, depending on the code.

Sources

  1. Korringa, J. (1947). On the calculation of the energy of a Bloch wave in a metal. Physica, 13, 392–400. DOI: 10.1016/0031-8914(47)90013-X ↗
  2. Gyorffy, B. L. (1972). Coherent potential approximation for random substitutional binary alloys. Physical Review B, 5, 2382–2384. link ↗
  3. Vosko, S. H., Wilk, L., Nusair, M. (2003). Accurate spin-dependent electron liquid correlation energies. Canadian Journal of Physics, 58, 1200–1211. link ↗

How to cite this page

ScholarGate. (2026, June 3). Korringa-Kohn-Rostoker Method. ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/en/quantum-computing/kkr-method

Related methods

Density Functional TheoryHartree-Fock MethodTight-Binding Model

Which method?

Set this method beside its closest kin and read them side by side — the library lays the books on the table; the choice is yours.

  • Density Functional TheoryQuantum Computing↔ compare
  • Hartree-Fock MethodQuantum Computing↔ compare
  • Tight-Binding ModelQuantum Computing↔ compare
Compare side by side →

Referenced by

Tight-Binding Model

Similar methods

Density Functional TheoryTight-Binding ModelHartree-Fock MethodTime-Dependent DFTEXAFSPhase-Field ModelingMoller-Plesset Perturbation TheoryQuantum Monte Carlo

Related reference concepts

Electronic Structure and Density Functional TheoryNearly Free Electron and Tight-Binding ModelsElectronic Band TheoryElectronic Structure MethodsDensity Functional TheoryComputational Quantum Mechanics

Spotted an issue on this page? Report or suggest a fix →

ScholarGate — KKR Method (Korringa-Kohn-Rostoker Method). Retrieved 2026-07-21 from https://scholargate.app/en/quantum-computing/kkr-method · Dataset: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20539026
Quick facts
Originator
Joop Korringa and Walter Kohn
Subfamily
Multiple Scattering Method
Year
1947
Type
Electronic structure method
Related methods
Density Functional TheoryHartree-Fock MethodTight-Binding Model
ScholarGate

A content-first reference library for research methods — what each one is, how it works, and where it comes from.

Open data (CC-BY)

Explore

  • Library
  • Search the library…
  • Browse by field
  • Fields
  • Journey
  • Compare
  • Which method?

Reference

  • Subjects
  • Atlas
  • Glossary
  • Methodology
  • Philosophy

Your tools

  • Bookshelf
  • Desk
  • Chat

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Contact
  • Suggest a method

Entries are compiled from published sources for reference. Verifying the accuracy and suitability of any information for your own use remains your responsibility.

© 2026 ScholarGate · A research-method reference library
  • Privacy
  • Cookies
  • Terms
  • Delete account