Economic Voting Analysis
Economic voting analysis is the formal study of how voters reward or punish incumbents according to economic performance. In the reward-punishment (retrospective) model pioneered by Gerald Kramer in 1971, support for the governing party is a function of recent economic outcomes — growth, unemployment, and inflation — so that good times re-elect incumbents and bad times turn them out. Michael Lewis-Beck and Mary Stegmaier's 2000 review consolidated the field, establishing that economic voting is predominantly sociotropic (based on the national economy rather than personal finances) and that its strength depends on the clarity of responsibility: how easily voters can attribute outcomes to the incumbent.
Read the full method
Sign in with a free account to read this section.
Method map
The neighbourhood of related methods — select a node to explore.
Sources
- Kramer, G. H. (1971). Short-Term Fluctuations in U.S. Voting Behavior, 1896-1964. American Political Science Review, 65(1), 131-143. DOI: 10.2307/1955049 ↗
- Lewis-Beck, M. S., & Stegmaier, M. (2000). Economic Determinants of Electoral Outcomes. Annual Review of Political Science, 3, 183-219. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.polisci.3.1.183 ↗
How to cite this page
ScholarGate. (2026, June 22). Economic Voting Model (Retrospective and Reward-Punishment). ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/en/political-economy/economic-voting-analysis
Which method?
Set this method beside its closest kin and read them side by side — the library lays the books on the table; the choice is yours.
- Median Voter ModelPolitical Economy↔ compare
- Political Budget Cycle AnalysisPolitical Economy↔ compare
- Probabilistic Voting ModelPolitical Economy↔ compare
- Spatial Voting ModelPolitical Science↔ compare