Skip to contentScholarGate
LibraryBookshelfDeskReview StudioAssistant
Sign in
On this page
IntuitionHow it worksWhen to use itStrengths & limitationsCommon pitfallsApplicationsFrequently asked🔒 Read the full methodSourcesRelated methods
Cite this pageSpotted an issue on this page? Report or suggest a fix →
Home›Pain Medicine›FLACC Behavioral Pain Scale
Process / pipelinebehavioral pain assessment for nonverbal patients

FLACC Behavioral Pain Scale

FLACC Behavioral Pain Scale (Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability) · Also known as: FLACC, FLACC Scale

The FLACC Behavioral Pain Scale (Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability) is a 5-item observational tool developed by Merkel and Voepel-Lewis in 1997 to assess acute pain in children ages 2 months to 7 years who are unable to self-report pain. Each of the five behavioral domains is scored 0-2, yielding a total score of 0-10. The FLACC is widely used in pediatric hospitals, recovery rooms, and intensive care units for postoperative and acute pain assessment.

ScholarGate
  1. Process / pipeline
  2. v1
  3. 3 Sources
  4. PUBLISHED
Cite this page →
Tools & resources
Download slides
Learn & explore

Read the full method

Members only

Sign in with a free account to read this section.

Sign in

Method map

The neighbourhood of related methods — select a node to explore.

FLACC Behavioral Pain Scale
McGill Pain QuestionnaireNeuropathic Pain ScalePain Anxiety Symptoms Sc…

When to use it

The FLACC is the recommended pain assessment tool for children ages 2 months to 7 years (and up to 20 years for children with cognitive impairment) unable to self-report pain verbally or numerically. Indicated uses include postoperative pain assessment in recovery rooms and pediatric units, acute pain during procedures (venipuncture, wound dressing, medication administration), intensive care pain assessment in sedated or unconscious children, and research on pediatric pain. The FLACC is particularly valuable in settings where rapid, objective, non-invasive pain assessment is needed to guide medication timing and dosing. It should not be used for children who can reliably self-report pain; numerical or verbal rating scales are preferred when available.

Strengths & limitations

Strengths
  • Excellent reliability and validity in pediatric populations: inter-rater reliability ICC 0.74-0.93, convergent validity with self-report pain scales in older children (r 0.65-0.80)
  • Quick to administer: 1-2 minutes of observation, enabling frequent reassessment without disrupting care
  • Simple, objective behavioral criteria requiring minimal training; no specialized equipment or child cooperation needed
  • Validated in diverse pediatric populations: healthy children, postoperative patients, critically ill children, children with developmental delay
  • Widely adopted in pediatric hospitals and endorsed by major pediatric pain organizations (American Pain Society, American Academy of Pediatrics)
Limitations
  • Limited applicability to children >7 years (or >20 years with cognitive impairment) where self-report scales are preferred; behavioral observation alone becomes less valid in older children with developed pain vocabulary
  • Baseline behavioral state influences interpretability; children with autism, developmental delay, or neurological impairment may show atypical behaviors unrelated to pain, reducing discriminant validity
  • Environmental and contextual factors (hunger, fatigue, overstimulation) produce behavioral changes mimicking pain; observer must account for context
  • Sedated children show minimal behavioral responses, making FLACC unreliable in deeply sedated populations; require behavioral pain scales validated in sedation or physiological measures

Frequently asked

Can I use FLACC in children older than 7 years?

The FLACC is designed and validated for children ages 2 months to 7 years. For children 8+ years, use self-report pain scales (0-10 Numeric Rating Scale, Wong-Baker Faces Pain Rating Scale if visual analog capability is limited). Exception: FLACC can be used in children up to 20 years with severe developmental delay or cognitive impairment who cannot self-report; behavioral criteria remain valid, though baseline behavior patterns require individual consideration.

What if the child is asleep or sedated?

FLACC is less reliable in sleeping or deeply sedated children because pain behaviors (movement, crying, facial expression) are suppressed by sleep or sedation. Assess FLACC during periods of wakefulness or light sedation. For deeply sedated patients, use validated pain scales for sedated populations (e.g., CPOT—Critical-Care Pain Observation Tool) or physiological measures (heart rate, blood pressure) as complementary assessment.

What does a FLACC score of 2 or 3 mean?

Scores 0-3 suggest mild or no pain, though score interpretation depends on baseline. If the child's baseline resting FLACC is 0 and during a procedure increases to 2-3, this indicates a pain response (change of 2-3 points is meaningful). If the child has developmental delay and baseline is 2-3, change in score is more clinically relevant than absolute score. Always compare current score to baseline.

How do I ensure consistent FLACC scoring among multiple nurses?

Inconsistent scoring occurs without standardization. Train all caregivers using the FLACC training materials with video examples that show behavioral criteria (0, 1, 2 for each domain). Have caregivers practice simultaneous scoring of the same patient interactions until inter-rater reliability is demonstrated. Document baseline FLACC behavior for each patient to contextualize future scores.

Sources

  1. Merkel, S.I., Voepel-Lewis, T., Shayevitz, J.R., & Malviya, S. (1997). The FLACC: A behavioral scale for scoring postoperative pain in young children. Pediatric Nursing, 23(3), 293-297. link ↗
  2. Voepel-Lewis, T., Zanotti, J., Dammeyer, J.A., & Merkel, S. (2010). Reliability and validity of the face, legs, activity, cry, consolability behavioral tool in assessing acute pain in critically ill patients. American Journal of Critical Care, 11(1), 12-20. DOI: 10.4037/ajcc2010624 ↗
  3. Nilsson, S., Enskär, K., & Kling, A.M. (2008). Postoperative pain and behavioral responses after instructive and supportive telephone calls after surgery. Journal for Specialists in Pediatric Nursing, 13(1), 42-52. link ↗

How to cite this page

ScholarGate. (2026, June 3). FLACC Behavioral Pain Scale (Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability). ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/en/pain-medicine/flacc-scale

Related methods

McGill Pain QuestionnaireNeuropathic Pain ScalePain Anxiety Symptoms Scale

Which method?

Set this method beside its closest kin and read them side by side — the library lays the books on the table; the choice is yours.

  • McGill Pain QuestionnairePain Medicine↔ compare
  • Neuropathic Pain ScalePain Medicine↔ compare
  • Pain Anxiety Symptoms ScalePain Medicine↔ compare
Compare side by side →

Similar methods

N-PASSPIPPNumerical Rating Scale for PainBehavioral Pain ScaleNumeric Rating Scale for PainVisual Analog Scale for PainApgar ScoreITQOL

Related reference concepts

Pediatric Pain ManagementPain Assessment and MeasurementPain Management in Special PopulationsAcute Pain in Critical IllnessAnalgesic Agents and Pain ManagementProcedural Pain and Anxiety

Spotted an issue on this page? Report or suggest a fix →

ScholarGate — FLACC Behavioral Pain Scale (FLACC Behavioral Pain Scale (Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability)). Retrieved 2026-07-21 from https://scholargate.app/en/pain-medicine/flacc-scale · Dataset: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20539026
Quick facts
Originator
Shelly I. Merkel and Terri Voepel-Lewis
Subfamily
behavioral pain assessment for nonverbal patients
Year
1997
Type
Behavioral observation scale for acute pain in children and nonverbal patients
Related methods
McGill Pain QuestionnaireNeuropathic Pain ScalePain Anxiety Symptoms Scale
ScholarGate

A content-first reference library for research methods — what each one is, how it works, and where it comes from.

Open data (CC-BY)

Explore

  • Library
  • Search the library…
  • Browse by field
  • Fields
  • Journey
  • Compare
  • Which method?

Reference

  • Subjects
  • Atlas
  • Glossary
  • Methodology
  • Philosophy

Your tools

  • Bookshelf
  • Desk
  • Chat

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Contact
  • Suggest a method

Entries are compiled from published sources for reference. Verifying the accuracy and suitability of any information for your own use remains your responsibility.

© 2026 ScholarGate · A research-method reference library
  • Privacy
  • Cookies
  • Terms
  • Delete account