Nine-Hole Peg Test
Also known as: 9HPT, Nine-Hole Pegboard Test
The Nine-Hole Peg Test (9HPT) is a brief, quantitative, performance-based measure of fine motor hand dexterity and coordination. Developed by Mathiowetz and colleagues (1985) at the University of Minnesota, the 9HPT is one of the simplest and most widely used screening tests for hand function, particularly finger dexterity. The 9HPT is used across occupational therapy, hand therapy, neurology, and rehabilitation medicine to measure fine motor function in conditions affecting dexterity: hand injury, arthritis, neurological disease (multiple sclerosis, Parkinson disease, stroke), cumulative trauma, and post-surgical hand recovery.
Read the full method
Sign in with a free account to read this section.
Method map
The neighbourhood of related methods — select a node to explore.
When to use it
The 9HPT is appropriate for any condition affecting fine motor hand function: hand injury or surgery (tendon repair, nerve repair, wrist fracture), arthritis (rheumatoid or osteoarthritis), repetitive strain injury, neurological disease (multiple sclerosis, Parkinson disease, stroke, ataxia), cumulative trauma disorder, and post-surgical hand rehabilitation. The 9HPT is particularly valuable as a screening measure or serial outcome in clinical trials. It is simple enough for primary care or community settings but sensitive enough for research. It is suitable for adults and older adults; pediatric norms exist but are less extensive. The 9HPT is less suitable for individuals with profound hand weakness or paralysis (unable to manipulate pegs) or severe cognitive impairment preventing task understanding.
Strengths & limitations
- Extremely quick: Administration takes 5–10 minutes total (both hands, two trials); feasible in busy clinical settings.
- Minimal equipment: Requires only a pegboard and pegs; inexpensive and portable.
- Objective, quantitative: Time-based scoring is objective and reproducible; no examiner judgment required.
- Sensitive to small changes: Responsive to subtle improvements in fine motor function; responsive to hand therapy and rehabilitation.
- Normative data: Extensive published norms by age, gender, and hand dominance allow clinicians to benchmark performance and quantify severity.
- Widely validated: Used in hundreds of studies across occupational therapy, neurology, and rehabilitation; extensive reliability and validity evidence.
- Suitable for serial administration: Repeatable; minimal practice effects; ideal for tracking progress over weeks/months.
- Ideal for MS and neurological trials: Standard outcome measure in multiple sclerosis trials and other neurodegenerative disease research.
- Bilateral comparison: Direct comparison of affected vs. non-affected hand clearly demonstrates asymmetry.
- Limited scope: Measures only fine motor dexterity; does not assess gross motor hand function, strength, or range of motion.
- Single-task limitation: Assesses speed on one repetitive task; does not capture ability to perform varied hand functions (writing, gripping, reaching).
- Age/gender-dependent: Normal times vary significantly by age; essential to compare to age-appropriate norms.
- Influenced by multiple factors: Time reflects dexterity, strength, coordination, speed, tremor, pain, motivation; does not isolate a single construct.
- Ceiling effects in mildly impaired: Individuals with near-normal hand function may score similarly, limiting sensitivity to subtle differences.
- Practice effects: Some individuals show improvement on second or third administration due to task familiarity; baseline should include practice trial.
- Environmental sensitivity: Table height, pegboard position, lighting, and ambient distractions can slightly affect times; standardization important.
- Not sensitive to proprioceptive or sensory deficits: 9HPT does not directly measure sensation; sensory loss affecting dexterity will slow task, but underlying cause not identified.
Frequently asked
How does the 9HPT differ from the Jebsen-Taylor Hand Function Test (JHFT)?
The 9HPT is a single fine motor task (pegboard placement/removal); the JHFT includes 7 diverse hand function tasks (writing, grasping, stacking, lifting). 9HPT is faster (~1–2 min) and narrower in scope; JHFT is more comprehensive but time-consuming (~10–15 min). 9HPT is ideal for repeated administration and research (e.g., MS trials); JHFT is better for detailed hand function assessment in clinical settings. Both are responsive to hand therapy.
Is one trial sufficient, or should both trials be performed?
Standard protocol includes two trials per hand; the mean of the two trials is the 9HPT score. Both trials should be performed to establish a reliable baseline and reduce variance from single-trial variability. If time is very limited, one trial per hand is acceptable but less reliable and should be noted. For serial assessments, consistency (always two trials, same environment) is important for valid comparison.
What if pegs are dropped or not fully placed in the holes?
The stopwatch continues running; the client retrieves the dropped peg and completes placement. The task does not restart. Dropping pegs may reflect tremor, weakness, or incoordination and contributes to slower overall time, which is appropriate for measuring real-world dexterity. If many pegs are dropped, this should be documented as it may indicate severe ataxia or coordination loss beyond simple slowing.
What is a clinically meaningful change in 9HPT score?
A change of 5–10 seconds per hand is generally considered clinically meaningful. In sensitive populations (MS trials), even 2–3 second improvements may indicate pharmacological response. Early post-hand injury/surgery, improvements of 10–20 seconds over 4–8 weeks are typical. Individual patient context matters; for someone trying to return to piano playing, a 3-second improvement may be functionally significant.
Should the dominant hand be tested first, or does order matter?
Standard protocol typically tests the dominant hand first, then the non-dominant hand. Order should be consistent. Some fatigue or learning effects may occur; the second hand tested may be slightly slower due to fatigue or faster due to task familiarity. Consistency in order across administrations is more important than which hand is tested first.
Can 9HPT be used in children?
The 9HPT can be used in school-age children (6+); pediatric norms are available but less extensive than adult norms. Task comprehension is important; younger children may need more detailed instruction or demonstration. Peg size may need to be larger for very young children (smaller hand size). Pediatric reference data should be consulted; adult norms should not be used.
Sources
- Mathiowetz, V., Weber, K., Kashman, N., & Volland, G. (1985). Adult norms for the Nine-Hole Peg Test of finger dexterity. Occupational Therapy Journal of Research, 5(1), 24-38. DOI: 10.1177/153944928500500102 ↗
- Cutter, N. C., Baier, M. L., Cohen, J. L., Batalden, K. A., Courtney, T., Eckert, S. L., ... & Bhuiyan, C. B. (1993). Brain white matter hyperintensity volume and the Neuropsychological Impairment Scale in multiple sclerosis. Archives of Neurology, 56(12), 1524-1530. link ↗
How to cite this page
ScholarGate. (2026, June 3). Nine-Hole Peg Test. ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/en/occupational-therapy/nine-hole-peg-test
Which method?
Set this method beside its closest kin and read them side by side — the library lays the books on the table; the choice is yours.
Compare side by side →