Skip to contentScholarGate
LibraryBookshelfDeskReview StudioAssistant
Sign in
On this page
IntuitionHow it worksWhen to use itStrengths & limitationsCommon pitfallsApplicationsFrequently asked🔒 Read the full methodSourcesRelated methods
Cite this pageSpotted an issue on this page? Report or suggest a fix →
Home›Nursing›Bates-Jensen Wound Assessment Tool
Process / pipelineWound assessment and monitoring

Bates-Jensen Wound Assessment Tool

Bates-Jensen Wound Assessment Tool for Pressure Ulcer Evaluation · Also known as: BJWAT, Bates-Jensen Assessment Tool, Pressure Ulcer Scale for Healing

The Bates-Jensen Wound Assessment Tool (BJWAT), originally developed as the Pressure Sore Status Tool, is a comprehensive instrument for objectively assessing pressure ulcer characteristics and monitoring healing progress. Created by Barbara M. Bates-Jensen, the tool evaluates 13 distinct wound dimensions including size, depth, tissue type, and exudate. It provides quantitative assessment of wound severity and is useful for tracking changes over time and evaluating treatment effectiveness.

ScholarGate
  1. Process / pipeline
  2. v1
  3. 2 Sources
  4. PUBLISHED
Cite this page →
Tools & resources
Download slides
Learn & explore

Read the full method

Members only

Sign in with a free account to read this section.

Sign in

Method map

The neighbourhood of related methods — select a node to explore.

Bates-Jensen Wound Assessment Tool
Braden ScaleCare Dependency ScaleNursing-Sensitive Indica…Norton ScaleNumerical Rating Scale f…

When to use it

Apply the BJWAT when a pressure ulcer has been identified to establish baseline severity and create a standardized monitoring system. Assess weekly or more frequently if changes are occurring. Use when communicating wound status to other healthcare providers, documenting for reimbursement purposes, and evaluating treatment response. Continue assessment throughout the ulcer's trajectory until healed.

Strengths & limitations

Strengths
  • Comprehensive assessment of multiple wound dimensions rather than single measurement
  • High validity and reliability for assessing and tracking pressure ulcer healing
  • Provides objective scoring that reduces subjective interpretation
  • Sensitive to both improvements and deterioration in wound status
  • Useful for research, outcome measurement, and treatment evaluation
  • Facilitates interdisciplinary communication regarding wound status
Limitations
  • Time-consuming to complete, requiring 10-15 minutes of assessment and documentation
  • Requires training and experience for consistent and accurate scoring of subjective items
  • Does not account for all wound assessment considerations (e.g., pain, infection bioburden)
  • Scoring subjective dimensions may vary between assessors without standardized training
  • Difficult to implement in settings with limited time or resources for detailed assessment

Frequently asked

How often should the BJWAT be completed?

Most commonly weekly, though frequency may increase to every 2-3 days if the wound is changing rapidly or treatment is being adjusted. Frequency should be consistent to enable meaningful trend analysis.

Who should complete the BJWAT assessment?

Any qualified clinician can use the BJWAT, though consistency in assessor is preferred. Nurses, wound care specialists, and physicians are common users. Training ensures accurate and reliable scoring.

What does a BJWAT score indicate about healing?

Lower scores indicate better healing and less severe wounds. Generally, scores below 12-15 suggest significant healing. Increasing scores indicate deterioration. Serial scoring tracks the trajectory of healing or deterioration.

Can the BJWAT be used for non-pressure wounds?

While designed for pressure ulcers, the BJWAT has been adapted and used for assessing other chronic wounds including diabetic foot ulcers, venous ulcers, and surgical wounds. However, some dimensions may be more relevant than others depending on wound type.

Sources

  1. Bates-Jensen, B. M. (1997). The Pressure Sore Status Tool: an outcome measure for pressure sores. Journal of Gerontological Nursing, 23(5), 20-28. link ↗
  2. Bates-Jensen, B. M., Vredevoe, D. L., & Brecht, M. L. (2001). Diffuse reflectance spectrophotometry: A potential tool for detecting pressure ulcer risk on darker skin. Advances in Skin and Wound Care, 14(3), 141-147. link ↗

How to cite this page

ScholarGate. (2026, June 3). Bates-Jensen Wound Assessment Tool for Pressure Ulcer Evaluation. ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/en/nursing/wound-assessment-bates-jensen

Related methods

Braden ScaleCare Dependency ScaleNursing-Sensitive Indicators

Which method?

Set this method beside its closest kin and read them side by side — the library lays the books on the table; the choice is yours.

  • Braden ScaleNursing↔ compare
  • Care Dependency ScaleNursing↔ compare
  • Nursing-Sensitive IndicatorsNursing↔ compare
Compare side by side →

Referenced by

Braden ScaleNorton ScaleNumerical Rating Scale for Pain

Similar methods

Waterlow Pressure Injury Risk AssessmentBraden ScaleNorton ScaleCare Dependency ScaleTherapeutic Touch Assessment ScaleBarthel IndexPerson-Centred Care Assessment ToolHolistic Caring Inventory

Related reference concepts

Wound Care and DressingPressure Injury and Skin CareWound Healing and Protein NutritionMalnutrition Universal Screening Tool (MUST)Mini Nutritional Assessment (MNA) in Older AdultsSurgical Wound Care and Healing

Spotted an issue on this page? Report or suggest a fix →

ScholarGate — Bates-Jensen Wound Assessment Tool (Bates-Jensen Wound Assessment Tool for Pressure Ulcer Evaluation). Retrieved 2026-07-21 from https://scholargate.app/en/nursing/wound-assessment-bates-jensen · Dataset: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20539026
Quick facts
Originator
Barbara M. Bates-Jensen
Subfamily
Wound assessment and monitoring
Year
1990
Type
Assessment tool
Related methods
Braden ScaleCare Dependency ScaleNursing-Sensitive Indicators
ScholarGate

A content-first reference library for research methods — what each one is, how it works, and where it comes from.

Open data (CC-BY)

Explore

  • Library
  • Search the library…
  • Browse by field
  • Fields
  • Journey
  • Compare
  • Which method?

Reference

  • Subjects
  • Atlas
  • Glossary
  • Methodology
  • Philosophy

Your tools

  • Bookshelf
  • Desk
  • Chat

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Contact
  • Suggest a method

Entries are compiled from published sources for reference. Verifying the accuracy and suitability of any information for your own use remains your responsibility.

© 2026 ScholarGate · A research-method reference library
  • Privacy
  • Cookies
  • Terms
  • Delete account