Skip to contentScholarGate
LibraryBookshelfDeskReview StudioAssistant
Sign in
On this page
IntuitionHow it worksWhen to use itStrengths & limitationsCommon pitfallsApplicationsFrequently asked🔒 Read the full methodSourcesRelated methods
Cite this pageSpotted an issue on this page? Report or suggest a fix →
Home›Neurology›WFNS Scale: World Federation of Neurosurgical Societies Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Scale
Process / pipelineSubarachnoid hemorrhage severity classification

WFNS Scale: World Federation of Neurosurgical Societies Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Scale

World Federation of Neurosurgical Societies Scale for Subarachnoid Hemorrhage · Also known as: WFNS Grading Scale

The WFNS Scale is a standardized grading system for assessing severity and prognosis in subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) published by the World Federation of Neurosurgical Societies in 1988. The five-point scale combines the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) with presence of motor deficit to classify SAH severity. The WFNS Scale is more objective than the earlier Hunt-Hess Scale and is increasingly preferred in contemporary neurosurgical practice, particularly in Europe and internationally.

ScholarGate
  1. Process / pipeline
  2. v1
  3. 1 Sources
  4. PUBLISHED
Cite this page →
Tools & resources
Download slides
Learn & explore

Read the full method

Members only

Sign in with a free account to read this section.

Sign in

Method map

The neighbourhood of related methods — select a node to explore.

WFNS Scale
EDSSHunt and Hess ScaleMDS-UPDRSNIHSS

When to use it

Indicated for all patients with confirmed subarachnoid hemorrhage (aneurysmal or non-aneurysmal) at admission and reassessed if clinical deterioration occurs. WFNS grade guides: (1) surgical urgency and timing decisions (good-grade patients offered surgery within 48 hours; poor-grade patients emergent or palliative); (2) prognostic counseling of families regarding expected outcomes; (3) ICU resource allocation (intensive monitoring vs comfort care); (4) stratification in clinical trials comparing SAH management strategies. Increasingly preferred over Hunt-Hess in modern practice due to objective GCS component. Used internationally, particularly in Europe, Asia, and increasingly in North America.

Strengths & limitations

Strengths
  • Incorporates Glasgow Coma Scale, an objective, validated consciousness measurement tool reducing inter-rater variability compared to subjective Hunt-Hess descriptors.
  • Distinguishes motor deficit presence, which adds specificity to severity classification beyond consciousness level alone.
  • Published outcome data across large multicenter cohorts (European SAH registries, Japanese multicenter studies); prognostic accuracy well-established across patient populations.
  • More granular than Hunt-Hess: WFNS incorporates GCS 11-14 range separately, better discriminating between moderate-consciousness-level patients.
  • Facilitates comparison across international studies due to standardized GCS use; increasingly adopted in major SAH trials.
  • Simpler algorithm than Hunt-Hess (binary combination of GCS range and motor deficit yes/no) with less subjective interpretation.
Limitations
  • Ordinal scale without interval properties; Grade I to II may not represent equivalent severity difference as Grade IV to V.
  • Requires trained clinician to perform accurate GCS assessment; inter-rater variability in GCS components (verbal response, eye opening in intubated patient) impacts grade assignment.
  • Does not incorporate imaging severity (CT blood volume, intraventricular hemorrhage, aneurysm size/location), known to independently predict outcome; clinical grade alone may be insufficient.
  • GCS validity limited in sedated or intubated patients (eye opening, verbal response scores unreliable); WFNS grade assessment deferred until sedation cleared or requires GCS adjustment protocols.
  • Motor deficit definition somewhat subjective; absence of documented focal deficit does not exclude minor weakness; minor hemiparesis might be missed in drowsy patient.
  • Limited data comparing WFNS to Hunt-Hess in same cohorts; head-to-head studies show modest differences (correlation r=0.7-0.8) with overlapping prognostic accuracy.

Frequently asked

What is the difference between WFNS and Hunt-Hess scales?

Hunt-Hess uses subjective descriptors (alert, drowsy, confused, stuporous, comatose) and presence of focal deficit. WFNS uses objective Glasgow Coma Scale (3-15) combined with focal deficit. For equivalent severity, WFNS is often lower grade than Hunt-Hess due to different thresholds (e.g., GCS 13-14 is Grade II WFNS but might be Grade II-III Hunt-Hess if drowsy/confused). Both predict outcome with similar accuracy (r=0.7-0.8 correlation). WFNS is more objective; Hunt-Hess is simpler. Most institutions use one system consistently; cite system used in publications.

Can WFNS grade be assigned in intubated patients?

With caution. GCS assessment in intubated patients is problematic: eye opening and verbal response are not evaluable (patient sedated and intubated); only motor response can be reliably scored. Some neurosurgeons use 'sedated GCS' or 'E1VtM3' notation (eye opening 1, verbal intubated, motor 3 example) acknowledging limitation. Better practice is to defer WFNS grade assessment until sedation clearance (24-48 hours post-extubation) when full GCS can be documented. Pre-intubation GCS (recorded by paramedics or ED) can be used if available, but acknowledge limitation.

How does WFNS relate to CT imaging severity scales like Fisher Scale?

WFNS assesses clinical severity (consciousness + neurological deficit); Fisher Scale assesses radiological severity (amount and distribution of subarachnoid blood on CT). The two are imperfectly correlated (r=0.5-0.7): small bleeds can produce severe deficits if in eloquent location; large bleeds can present with minimal deficits. Both WFNS and Fisher Scale independently predict outcome. Combined use (WFNS + Fisher) better predicts 30-day mortality and vasospasm risk than either alone. Report both when available.

What is considered a 'motor deficit' in WFNS grading?

Motor deficit includes: (1) Hemiparesis or hemiplegia (asymmetric strength 4/5 or lower on Motor Scale). (2) Aphasia or dysarthria (language/speech abnormality). (3) Pupil abnormality (anisocoria, blown pupil). (4) Ataxia or coordination abnormality. (5) Cranial nerve deficit (facial droop, eye deviation). Not included: drowsiness alone (part of GCS), headache, photophobia, nuchal rigidity (meningeal signs but not focal motor deficit). Absence of documented focal deficit means no motor deficit for WFNS grade determination, even if subtle weakness might be present.

Does WFNS grade change if patient improves clinically?

WFNS grade typically refers to admission/initial assessment grade used for prognostic correlation. If patient improves clinically (e.g., GCS improves from 13 to 15), the improved GCS is documented but the original WFNS grade stands for outcome analysis. Some centers reassess WFNS at 48-72 hours or after intervention (vasospasm treatment, surgery) to document interval change, but the admission grade remains the prognostic predictor used in outcome studies. Always specify timing of grade assessment.

Sources

  1. Drake, C. G. (1988). Report of the World Federation of Neurosurgical Societies Committee on a universal subarachnoid hemorrhage grading scale. Journal of Neurosurgery, 68(6), 985-986. DOI: 10.1136/jnnp.51.11.1457 ↗

How to cite this page

ScholarGate. (2026, June 3). World Federation of Neurosurgical Societies Scale for Subarachnoid Hemorrhage. ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/en/neurology/world-federation-neurosurgeons

Related methods

EDSSHunt and Hess ScaleMDS-UPDRSNIHSS

Which method?

Set this method beside its closest kin and read them side by side — the library lays the books on the table; the choice is yours.

  • EDSSNeurology↔ compare
  • Hunt and Hess ScaleNeurology↔ compare
  • MDS-UPDRSNeurology↔ compare
  • NIHSSNeurology↔ compare
Compare side by side →

Referenced by

Hunt and Hess ScaleNIHSS

Similar methods

Hunt and Hess ScaleGlasgow Coma ScaleNIHSSModified Rankin ScaleDisability Rating ScaleWest Haven Criteria for Hepatic EncephalopathyRichmond Agitation-Sedation ScaleSequential Organ Failure Assessment Score

Related reference concepts

Subarachnoid HemorrhageSubarachnoid HemorrhageNeurological Assessment and Glasgow Coma ScaleMental Status and Consciousness AssessmentIntracranial AneurysmCerebrovascular Surgical Pathology

Spotted an issue on this page? Report or suggest a fix →

ScholarGate — WFNS Scale (World Federation of Neurosurgical Societies Scale for Subarachnoid Hemorrhage). Retrieved 2026-07-21 from https://scholargate.app/en/neurology/world-federation-neurosurgeons · Dataset: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20539026
Quick facts
Originator
Drake and World Federation of Neurosurgical Societies Committee
Subfamily
Subarachnoid hemorrhage severity classification
Year
1988
Type
Clinician-rated
Related methods
EDSSHunt and Hess ScaleMDS-UPDRSNIHSS
ScholarGate

A content-first reference library for research methods — what each one is, how it works, and where it comes from.

Open data (CC-BY)

Explore

  • Library
  • Search the library…
  • Browse by field
  • Fields
  • Journey
  • Compare
  • Which method?

Reference

  • Subjects
  • Atlas
  • Glossary
  • Methodology
  • Philosophy

Your tools

  • Bookshelf
  • Desk
  • Chat

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Contact
  • Suggest a method

Entries are compiled from published sources for reference. Verifying the accuracy and suitability of any information for your own use remains your responsibility.

© 2026 ScholarGate · A research-method reference library
  • Privacy
  • Cookies
  • Terms
  • Delete account