Skip to contentScholarGate
LibraryBookshelfDeskReview StudioAssistant
Sign in
On this page
IntuitionHow it worksWhen to use itStrengths & limitationsCommon pitfallsApplicationsFrequently asked🔒 Read the full methodSourcesRelated methods
Cite this pageSpotted an issue on this page? Report or suggest a fix →
Home›Mining Engineering›Stereographic Slope Stability Analysis
Process / pipelineStereographic Geotechnical Analysis

Stereographic Slope Stability Analysis

Stereographic Projection for Slope Stability Analysis · Also known as: Stereonet Analysis, Stereographic Projection, Pole Plot Analysis

Stereographic projection is a graphical method for analyzing slope stability by representing the three-dimensional orientation of discontinuities (joints, bedding, faults) and the pit slope on a two-dimensional stereographic net (stereonet). The method enables rapid visual identification of potentially unstable slope geometries where discontinuities daylight out of the slope at steeper angles than the slope face.

ScholarGate
  1. Process / pipeline
  2. v1
  3. 2 Sources
  4. PUBLISHED
Cite this page →
Tools & resources
Download slides
Learn & explore

Read the full method

Members only

Sign in with a free account to read this section.

Sign in

Method map

The neighbourhood of related methods — select a node to explore.

Stereographic Slope Analysis
Hoek-Brown CriterionRock Mass RatingStope Layout

When to use it

Use stereographic analysis for open-pit slope design, especially where jointed rock governs stability over intact rock strength. Most effective when joint sets are well-defined and numerous measurements are available. Complements numerical modeling.

Strengths & limitations

Strengths
  • Rapid visual method; results are intuitive and communicable
  • Identifies critical joints without calculation; engineers quickly grasp failure modes
  • Enables design iteration: slope angle changes are immediately reflected on stereonet
  • Low cost: requires only orientation measurements and a stereonet plot
  • Works for complex multi-set jointing that would be difficult to analyze algebraically
Limitations
  • Graphical method introduces reading error; precise quantification requires numerical analysis
  • Does not directly account for joint strength; assumes friction angle is known
  • Discontinuities are assumed planar; curved surfaces (folding) are not handled
  • Assumes one or two active failure surfaces; complex failure mechanisms are harder to visualize
  • Temporal effects (weathering weakening joints, hydrostatic pressure) require additional analysis

Frequently asked

What is the difference between a pole and a great circle on a stereonet?

A pole is a single point representing the orientation of a discontinuity (its normal vector). A great circle is an arc representing the discontinuity plane itself. Both representations are useful; poles are more compact and enable pattern recognition.

How do I assess stability when I have three or more joint sets?

Visually inspect the stereonet for combinations of sets. Each pair can potentially form a wedge. Also, single-plane slides are possible. The most concerning configuration is when joint poles cluster in the unstable zone or when two sets intersect within the unstable zone.

How do I account for friction angle in stereonet analysis?

Plot the friction cone (kinematically unstable region) on the stereonet. The cone's size depends on friction angle: higher friction = smaller cone. Discontinuities outside the cone are stable even if they daylight; inside are potentially unstable.

Can stereographic analysis replace numerical slope stability analysis?

Stereographic analysis is excellent for rapid screening and identifying critical geometries. For final design, quantitative numerical analysis (limit equilibrium, finite element) is recommended to account for strength, pore pressure, and complex geometries.

How do I measure discontinuity orientation in the field accurately?

Use a compass and clinometer or Brunton compass with built-in inclinometer. Measure dip direction (azimuth 0-360°) and dip angle (0-90° from horizontal). Always measure consistent surfaces (smooth, representative areas). Repeat measurements to check consistency.

Sources

  1. Priest, S. D. (1985). Hemispherical projection methods in rock mechanics. In Society for Mining, Metallurgy & Exploration, Technical Library. link ↗
  2. Hoek, E., & Bray, J. W. (2007). Rock slope engineering (3rd ed.). Spon Press. ISBN: 978-0-415-35938-3

How to cite this page

ScholarGate. (2026, June 3). Stereographic Projection for Slope Stability Analysis. ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/en/mining-engineering/stereographic-slope-analysis

Related methods

Hoek-Brown CriterionRock Mass RatingStope Layout

Which method?

Set this method beside its closest kin and read them side by side — the library lays the books on the table; the choice is yours.

  • Hoek-Brown CriterionMining Engineering↔ compare
  • Rock Mass RatingMining Engineering↔ compare
  • Stope LayoutMining Engineering↔ compare
Compare side by side →

Similar methods

Geologic MappingSlope Stability (Bishop-Janbu)Geomechanical ModelingHoek-Brown CriterionStope LayoutRock Mass ClassificationLandslide Susceptibility MappingRock Mass Rating

Related reference concepts

Structural GeologyFaults and FracturesStress, Strain, and Rock DeformationPotential Field Theory and Gravity AnomaliesX-ray Diffraction in MineralogyGeology

Spotted an issue on this page? Report or suggest a fix →

ScholarGate — Stereographic Slope Analysis (Stereographic Projection for Slope Stability Analysis). Retrieved 2026-07-21 from https://scholargate.app/en/mining-engineering/stereographic-slope-analysis · Dataset: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20539026
Quick facts
Originator
Structural Geology and Rock Mechanics Practice
Subfamily
Stereographic Geotechnical Analysis
Year
1960
Type
Graphical method for analyzing slope stability with respect to jointing
Related methods
Hoek-Brown CriterionRock Mass RatingStope Layout
ScholarGate

A content-first reference library for research methods — what each one is, how it works, and where it comes from.

Open data (CC-BY)

Explore

  • Library
  • Search the library…
  • Browse by field
  • Fields
  • Journey
  • Compare
  • Which method?

Reference

  • Subjects
  • Atlas
  • Glossary
  • Methodology
  • Philosophy

Your tools

  • Bookshelf
  • Desk
  • Chat

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Contact
  • Suggest a method

Entries are compiled from published sources for reference. Verifying the accuracy and suitability of any information for your own use remains your responsibility.

© 2026 ScholarGate · A research-method reference library
  • Privacy
  • Cookies
  • Terms
  • Delete account