Skip to contentScholarGate
LibraryBookshelfDeskReview StudioAssistant
Sign in
On this page
IntuitionHow it worksWhen to use itStrengths & limitationsCommon pitfallsApplicationsFrequently asked🔒 Read the full methodSourcesRelated methods
Cite this pageSpotted an issue on this page? Report or suggest a fix →
Home›Meteorology›Maximum Covariance Analysis
Process / pipelineStatistical analysis

Maximum Covariance Analysis

Maximum Covariance Analysis (MCA) · Also known as: MCA, Singular value decomposition, SVD analysis, Covariance analysis

Maximum covariance analysis (MCA) is a statistical technique that identifies coupled patterns of variability between two spatially distributed fields (e.g., sea surface temperature and precipitation). Unlike EOF analysis which focuses on variance in a single field, MCA identifies spatial patterns that are maximally correlated between two different fields.

ScholarGate
  1. Process / pipeline
  2. v1
  3. 2 Sources
  4. PUBLISHED
Cite this page →
Tools & resources
Download slides
Learn & explore

Read the full method

Members only

Sign in with a free account to read this section.

Sign in

Method map

The neighbourhood of related methods — select a node to explore.

Maximum Covariance Analysis
Empirical Orthogonal Tel…WRF Model

When to use it

Use MCA to identify coupled variability between two fields, to find teleconnections between distant variables (e.g., tropical SST and extratropical precipitation), to understand predictability based on coupling strength, and to reduce complexity in coupled systems.

Strengths & limitations

Strengths
  • Focuses on covariance between two fields rather than variance within a single field; reveals coupled modes
  • More interpretable than EOF analysis for understanding interactions between distinct components
  • Quantifies degree of coupling through singular values; stronger coupling means higher singular value
  • Extends naturally to analysis of lagged relationships (one field leads/lags the other)
Limitations
  • Results depend on choice of two fields; different field pairs give different results
  • MCA modes are not orthogonal in time; temporal overlap/lag structure can complicate interpretation
  • Dominated by linear relationships; nonlinear coupled modes are not captured
  • Significance of MCA modes must be assessed; not all modes represent significant coupling

Frequently asked

How is MCA different from EOF analysis?

EOF focuses on variance within a single field. MCA focuses on covariance between two fields. MCA reveals which patterns in field 1 are most tightly linked to patterns in field 2.

Can MCA show causality?

No. MCA shows correlation/covariance between patterns, not causality. To infer causality, you need additional tools (e.g., Granger causality, lagged regression) or physical reasoning.

What do singular values represent?

Singular values quantify the covariance explained by each MCA mode. Larger singular values indicate stronger coupling; a singular value of zero means no correlation.

Can I use MCA with lags?

Yes. Lagged MCA computes covariance between field 1 at time t and field 2 at time t+lag. This reveals whether patterns in field 1 lead/lag patterns in field 2.

Sources

  1. Bretherton, C. S., Widmann, M., Dymnikov, V. P., Wallace, J. M., & Blade, I. (1992). The effective number of spatial degrees of freedom of a time-varying field. Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, 49(11), 1063-1083. link ↗
  2. Newman, M., Sardeshmukh, P. D., & Penland, C. (2016). Relative Contributions to Subseasonal Predictability: Bridging Medium-Range and Climate Time Scales. Journal of Climate, 29(15), 5629-5647. link ↗

How to cite this page

ScholarGate. (2026, June 3). Maximum Covariance Analysis (MCA). ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/en/meteorology/maximum-covariance-analysis

Related methods

Empirical Orthogonal TeleconnectionWRF Model

Which method?

Set this method beside its closest kin and read them side by side — the library lays the books on the table; the choice is yours.

  • Empirical Orthogonal TeleconnectionMeteorology↔ compare
  • WRF ModelMeteorology↔ compare
Compare side by side →

Referenced by

Empirical Orthogonal Teleconnection

Similar methods

Empirical Orthogonal TeleconnectionSingular Spectrum AnalysisMultiple Correspondence AnalysisWavelet CoherenceCanonical Correlation AnalysisRobust Canonical Correlation AnalysisRobust Multiple Correspondence AnalysisMultiscale Spatial Autocorrelation

Related reference concepts

Canonical Correlation AnalysisClimate Variability and OscillationsPrincipal Component AnalysisEl Nino-Southern OscillationOcean-Atmosphere Interaction and ENSODetection and Attribution of Climate Change

Spotted an issue on this page? Report or suggest a fix →

ScholarGate — Maximum Covariance Analysis (Maximum Covariance Analysis (MCA)). Retrieved 2026-07-21 from https://scholargate.app/en/meteorology/maximum-covariance-analysis · Dataset: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20539026
Quick facts
Originator
Bretherton, Wallace
Subfamily
Statistical analysis
Year
1992
Type
Covariance decomposition method
Related methods
Empirical Orthogonal TeleconnectionWRF Model
ScholarGate

A content-first reference library for research methods — what each one is, how it works, and where it comes from.

Open data (CC-BY)

Explore

  • Library
  • Search the library…
  • Browse by field
  • Fields
  • Journey
  • Compare
  • Which method?

Reference

  • Subjects
  • Atlas
  • Glossary
  • Methodology
  • Philosophy

Your tools

  • Bookshelf
  • Desk
  • Chat

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Contact
  • Suggest a method

Entries are compiled from published sources for reference. Verifying the accuracy and suitability of any information for your own use remains your responsibility.

© 2026 ScholarGate · A research-method reference library
  • Privacy
  • Cookies
  • Terms
  • Delete account