Skip to contentScholarGate
LibraryBookshelfDeskReview StudioAssistant
Sign in
On this page
IntuitionHow it worksWhen to use itStrengths & limitationsCommon pitfallsApplicationsFrequently asked🔒 Read the full methodSourcesRelated methods
Cite this pageSpotted an issue on this page? Report or suggest a fix →
Home›Manufacturing›Additive Manufacturing Slicing
Process / pipelineComputational geometry

Additive Manufacturing Slicing

Additive Manufacturing Slicing and Layer Generation · Also known as: 3D printing slicing, Layer generation, Mesh slicing

Additive manufacturing slicing is the computational process of converting a three-dimensional CAD model into a series of two-dimensional cross-sectional layers that are sequentially built up by 3D printing hardware. Developed during the early maturation of stereolithography and selective laser sintering in the 1990s, this method bridges the gap between digital design and physical fabrication, enabling rapid prototyping and production of complex geometries.

ScholarGate
  1. Process / pipeline
  2. v1
  3. 3 Sources
  4. PUBLISHED
Cite this page →
Tools & resources
Download slides
Learn & explore

Read the full method

Members only

Sign in with a free account to read this section.

Sign in

Method map

The neighbourhood of related methods — select a node to explore.

Additive Manufacturing Slicing
CNC Tool Path GenerationDesign for Manufacturing…Modal AnalysisTolerance Stack-upTaylor Tool Life

When to use it

Use additive manufacturing slicing for any 3D printing application, from rapid prototyping to production manufacturing. It is essential when designs have internal cavities, complex overhangs, or organic geometries that would be expensive or impossible to manufacture subtractively. Assume the CAD model is geometrically valid and the printer is properly calibrated; manual layer planning is infeasible for intricate parts.

Strengths & limitations

Strengths
  • Enables fabrication of complex, organic shapes and internal structures impossible with subtractive methods
  • Automatically optimizes layer order and orientation to minimize support material and build time
  • Integrates seamlessly with CAD software for rapid design iteration
  • Works with diverse materials and printing technologies (polymer, metal, ceramic)
  • Produces fine geometric detail with layer-by-layer precision
Limitations
  • Surface quality is limited by layer height and resolution; thin layers increase build time
  • Support structures add material waste and require post-processing removal
  • Large parts may have mechanical weakness along layer lines due to anisotropic material properties
  • Slicing software is often proprietary; algorithms are not transparent to users

Frequently asked

What layer height should I choose for my print?

Layer height involves a trade-off: thinner layers (0.1-0.15 mm) produce finer detail and smooth surfaces but require more time. Thicker layers (0.3-0.4 mm) print faster but reduce precision. Start with 0.2 mm as a middle ground, then adjust based on your geometry and tolerance requirements.

Why do my prints have a rough surface finish along the layer lines?

This is inherent to layer-based manufacturing. Fine detail comes from thin layers and small nozzle diameter, but layer lines remain visible. Post-processing such as sanding, chemical smoothing, or vapor annealing can improve surface quality.

How much support structure do I really need?

Support is required for any unsupported geometry exceeding approximately 45 degrees from vertical. Modern slicers generate support automatically, but you can reduce support by reorienting the part or enabling tree support structures, which use less material than grid-based supports.

Can slicing algorithms handle internal voids or moving parts?

Yes, if the geometry is properly modeled as a solid with internal cavities. The slicer will generate layers that create the hollow spaces. For moving parts (gears, hinges), ensure minimal clearance is modeled; the slicer honors the geometry you provide.

Sources

  1. Ngo, T. D., Kashani, A., Imbalzano, G., Nguyen, K. T., & Hui, D. (2018). Additive manufacturing (3D printing): A review of materials, methods, applications and challenges. Composites Part B: Engineering, 143, 172-196. DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.02.012 ↗
  2. Gibson, I., Rosen, D. W., & Stucker, B. (2015). Additive Manufacturing Technologies: 3D Printing, Rapid Prototyping, and Direct Digital Manufacturing. Springer-Verlag, 2nd edition. link ↗
  3. Cheng, B., Chou, K., & Hsu, K. (2019). Experimental and numerical investigation on deformation and cracking of aluminum alloy cubes during direct laser additive manufacturing. Journal of Manufacturing Processes, 41, 131-143. link ↗

How to cite this page

ScholarGate. (2026, June 3). Additive Manufacturing Slicing and Layer Generation. ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/en/manufacturing/additive-manufacturing-slicing

Related methods

CNC Tool Path GenerationDesign for Manufacturing and AssemblyModal AnalysisTolerance Stack-up

Which method?

Set this method beside its closest kin and read them side by side — the library lays the books on the table; the choice is yours.

  • CNC Tool Path GenerationManufacturing↔ compare
  • Design for Manufacturing and AssemblyManufacturing↔ compare
  • Modal AnalysisManufacturing↔ compare
  • Tolerance Stack-upManufacturing↔ compare
Compare side by side →

Referenced by

CNC Tool Path GenerationDesign for Manufacturing and AssemblyModal AnalysisTaylor Tool LifeTolerance Stack-up

Similar methods

CNC Tool Path GenerationTopology OptimizationTolerance Stack-upDesign for Manufacturing and AssemblyFinite Element AnalysisContour AnalysisStereo MatchingSimulation-assisted design of experiments

Related reference concepts

Computer-Aided Design and 3D Printing in ProstheticsGeometric ModelingSolid and Implicit ModelingProduct Design and Design for ManufactureDigital and Parametric ArchitectureGeometry Processing

Spotted an issue on this page? Report or suggest a fix →

ScholarGate — Additive Manufacturing Slicing (Additive Manufacturing Slicing and Layer Generation). Retrieved 2026-07-21 from https://scholargate.app/en/manufacturing/additive-manufacturing-slicing · Dataset: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20539026
Quick facts
Originator
Deckard, C. R. et al.
Subfamily
Computational geometry
Year
1990s
Type
Computational method for additive manufacturing
Related methods
CNC Tool Path GenerationDesign for Manufacturing and AssemblyModal AnalysisTolerance Stack-up
ScholarGate

A content-first reference library for research methods — what each one is, how it works, and where it comes from.

Open data (CC-BY)

Explore

  • Library
  • Search the library…
  • Browse by field
  • Fields
  • Journey
  • Compare
  • Which method?

Reference

  • Subjects
  • Atlas
  • Glossary
  • Methodology
  • Philosophy

Your tools

  • Bookshelf
  • Desk
  • Chat

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Contact
  • Suggest a method

Entries are compiled from published sources for reference. Verifying the accuracy and suitability of any information for your own use remains your responsibility.

© 2026 ScholarGate · A research-method reference library
  • Privacy
  • Cookies
  • Terms
  • Delete account