Reference Accuracy Study
A reference accuracy study verifies the references in published work against their sources to estimate how often citations are wrong, distinguishing bibliographic errors (mistakes in author, title, year, volume, or pages) from quotation errors (cases where the cited source does not actually support the claim attributed to it). The method draws a sample of references, checks each one against the original document, and reports error rates as proportions with confidence intervals, often classifying errors by severity. Such studies have repeatedly found troubling rates: reviews of medical research, synthesized by Mogull (2017), put the quotation error rate near 14.5 percent, and Smith and Cumberledge (2020) found substantial quotation errors even in general science journals. For libraries and editors, these studies justify citation-checking services and reference-verification workflows.
Read the full method
Sign in with a free account to read this section.
Method map
The neighbourhood of related methods — select a node to explore.
Sources
- Mogull, S. A. (2017). Accuracy of cited "facts" in medical research articles: A review of study methodology and recalculation of quotation error rate. PLOS ONE, 12(9), e0184727. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0184727 ↗
- Smith, N., & Cumberledge, A. (2020). Quotation errors in general science journals. Proceedings of the Royal Society A, 476(2242), 20200538. DOI: 10.1098/rspa.2020.0538 ↗
How to cite this page
ScholarGate. (2026, June 23). Reference Accuracy Study (Citation and Quotation Error Analysis). ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/en/library-information-science/reference-accuracy-study
Which method?
Set this method beside its closest kin and read them side by side — the library lays the books on the table; the choice is yours.
- Citation Analysis for Collection DevelopmentLibrary Information Science↔ compare
- Citation Context AnalysisLibrary Information Science↔ compare