Bibliographic Record Quality Analysis
Bibliographic record quality analysis evaluates the catalogue records that describe library resources — typically MARC or linked-data records built to standards such as RDA — to determine how well they serve their purpose. Philip Hider's account of information resource description frames quality in terms of accuracy, completeness, consistency, and conformance to cataloguing rules, while Elaine Svenonius's objectives of the catalogue — to find, identify, select, and obtain resources — supply the functional yardstick against which records are ultimately judged. The analysis samples records, scores them on each quality criterion, checks their encoding and content against the relevant standard, and asks whether they actually let users carry out the catalogue's core tasks. The result is evidence about where cataloguing is strong, where it fails, and what remediation or policy change is needed.
Read the full method
Sign in with a free account to read this section.
Method map
The neighbourhood of related methods — select a node to explore.
Sources
- Hider, P. (2018). Information Resource Description: Creating and Managing Metadata (2nd ed.). London: Facet Publishing. ISBN: 9781783302239
- Svenonius, E. (2000). The Intellectual Foundation of Information Organization. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. ISBN: 9780262194334
How to cite this page
ScholarGate. (2026, June 23). Bibliographic Record Quality Analysis (Evaluating Catalogue Records Against Functional Objectives). ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/en/library-information-science/bibliographic-record-quality-analysis
Which method?
Set this method beside its closest kin and read them side by side — the library lays the books on the table; the choice is yours.
- Controlled Vocabulary IndexingLibrary Information Science↔ compare
- Metadata Quality AssessmentLibrary Information Science↔ compare
- Name Authority Control EvaluationLibrary Information Science↔ compare