Dyadic Conflict Analysis
Dyadic conflict analysis is the dominant research design in quantitative conflict studies: it treats the pair of states (the dyad), observed year by year, as the unit of analysis and models the probability that a pair experiences militarized conflict as a function of their joint and individual attributes. Stuart Bremer's 'Dangerous Dyads' (1992) is the canonical statement, identifying which conditions — contiguity, the absence of alliance, power parity, the absence of joint democracy, and others — make a pair of states war-prone. The design aligns conflict data with the relational theories that dominate the field.
Read the full method
Sign in with a free account to read this section.
Method map
The neighbourhood of related methods — select a node to explore.
Sources
- Bremer, S. A. (1992). Dangerous dyads: Conditions affecting the likelihood of interstate war, 1816–1965. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 36(2), 309–341. DOI: 10.1177/0022002792036002005 ↗
How to cite this page
ScholarGate. (2026, June 22). Dyad-Year Analysis of Interstate Conflict. ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/en/international-relations/dyadic-conflict-analysis
Which method?
Set this method beside its closest kin and read them side by side — the library lays the books on the table; the choice is yours.
- Correlates of War AnalysisInternational Relations↔ compare
- Democratic Peace AnalysisInternational Relations↔ compare
- Militarized Interstate Dispute AnalysisInternational Relations↔ compare