Skip to contentScholarGate
LibraryBookshelfDeskReview StudioAssistant
Sign in
On this page
IntuitionHow it worksWhen to use itStrengths & limitationsCommon pitfallsApplicationsFrequently asked🔒 Read the full methodSourcesRelated methods
Cite this pageSpotted an issue on this page? Report or suggest a fix →
Home›Health Measurement›MOS Social Support Survey
Process / pipelineFunctional and social support assessment

MOS Social Support Survey

Medical Outcomes Study Social Support Survey · Also known as: MOS-SS, Medical Outcomes Study Support Scale

The Medical Outcomes Study Social Support Survey (MOS-SS) is a 19-item self-report measure of social support developed by Sherbourne and Stewart in 1991. It assesses functional aspects of social relationships—emotional, informational, tangible, and social companionship support—relevant to health outcomes in diverse populations.

ScholarGate
  1. Process / pipeline
  2. v1
  3. 3 Sources
  4. PUBLISHED
Cite this page →
Tools & resources
Download slides
Learn & explore

Read the full method

Members only

Sign in with a free account to read this section.

Sign in

Method map

The neighbourhood of related methods — select a node to explore.

MOS Social Support Survey
Duke Health ProfileHAQ Disability IndexPROMISSF-36 Health SurveyWHOQOL-BREF

When to use it

The MOS-SS is appropriate for adults across health conditions, particularly in research examining social determinants of health outcomes and in interventions targeting social isolation. It is valuable in mental health research, chronic disease management, and health disparities studies. Population-specific adaptations exist for specific populations (e.g., HIV, cancer, elderly).

Strengths & limitations

Strengths
  • Multidimensional assessment of social support types (emotional, informational, tangible, companionship)
  • Brief 19-item format reduces respondent burden while maintaining psychometric integrity
  • Strong predictive validity for mental health outcomes, healthcare utilization, and mortality
  • Validated across diverse populations, health conditions, and cultural groups
  • Sensitive to changes in social support following interventions or life events
Limitations
  • Measures perceived rather than objective social support; reported availability may diverge from actual support received
  • Limited assessment of support quality or adequacy for specific needs; focuses on quantity and type
  • Potential responder bias: depression and anxiety may color perceptions of support availability
  • Normative data vary significantly by population; careful comparison group selection is essential

Frequently asked

What is the difference between MOS-SS and network measures of social support?

MOS-SS measures perceived functional support available to the person, regardless of network size. Network measures count number of relationships and frequency of contact. A person with few contacts but strong support (high MOS-SS) differs from one with many weak ties (large network but low MOS-SS). The two often correlate but measure distinct constructs.

Does a low MOS-SS score always mean social isolation?

Low MOS-SS scores may reflect isolation but also depression, anxiety, or negative affect that colors perception of support. Some socially isolated individuals report adequate support; others with many relationships perceive minimal support. Clinical assessment should combine MOS-SS with objective network information.

What does an MOS-SS domain score of 50 indicate?

A domain score of 50 (on 0–100 scale) indicates moderate perceived support in that domain. Whether this is clinically concerning depends on context and the person's needs; someone with limited support during mental health crisis would be at higher risk than someone with stable health.

Can MOS-SS be used in non-English speaking populations?

Yes; the MOS-SS has been translated and validated in 20+ languages. When using translations, ensure the version has been psychometrically validated in the target population and that cultural adaptations appropriately reflect local concepts of social support.

Sources

  1. Sherbourne, C. D., & Stewart, A. L. (1991). The MOS Social Support Survey. Social Science & Medicine, 32(6), 705–714. DOI: 10.1016/0277-9536(91)90150-B ↗
  2. Stewart, A. L., Hays, R. D., & Ware, J. E. (1988). The MOS Short-Form General Health Survey: reliability and validity in a patient population. Medical Care, 26(7), 724–735. DOI: 10.1097/00005650-198807000-00007 ↗
  3. Cohen, S. (1992). Stress, social support, and disorder. In S. H. Friedman (Ed.), Hostility, coping, and health (pp. 109–128). American Psychological Association. link ↗

How to cite this page

ScholarGate. (2026, June 3). Medical Outcomes Study Social Support Survey. ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/en/health-measurement/mos-social-support-survey

Related methods

Duke Health ProfileHAQ Disability IndexPROMISSF-36 Health SurveyWHOQOL-BREF

Which method?

Set this method beside its closest kin and read them side by side — the library lays the books on the table; the choice is yours.

  • Duke Health ProfileHealth Measurement↔ compare
  • HAQ Disability IndexHealth Measurement↔ compare
  • PROMISHealth Measurement↔ compare
  • SF-36 Health SurveyHealth Measurement↔ compare
  • WHOQOL-BREFHealth Measurement↔ compare
Compare side by side →

Referenced by

HAQ Disability Index

Similar methods

Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social SupportOnline Social Support ScaleSocial Provisions ScaleSocial Support AssessmentSESLubben Social Network ScaleMultidimensional Loneliness AssessmentSocial Functioning Assessment

Related reference concepts

Social and Environmental AssessmentHealth-Related Quality of LifePsychosocial and Functional AssessmentPatient-Reported Outcome MeasuresSocial Support GroupsCommunity & Social Services

Spotted an issue on this page? Report or suggest a fix →

ScholarGate — MOS Social Support Survey (Medical Outcomes Study Social Support Survey). Retrieved 2026-07-21 from https://scholargate.app/en/health-measurement/mos-social-support-survey · Dataset: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20539026
Quick facts
Originator
Cathy D. Sherbourne and Alice L. Stewart
Subfamily
Functional and social support assessment
Year
1991
Type
Social support perception measurement
Related methods
Duke Health ProfileHAQ Disability IndexPROMISSF-36 Health SurveyWHOQOL-BREF
ScholarGate

A content-first reference library for research methods — what each one is, how it works, and where it comes from.

Open data (CC-BY)

Explore

  • Library
  • Search the library…
  • Browse by field
  • Fields
  • Journey
  • Compare
  • Which method?

Reference

  • Subjects
  • Atlas
  • Glossary
  • Methodology
  • Philosophy

Your tools

  • Bookshelf
  • Desk
  • Chat

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Contact
  • Suggest a method

Entries are compiled from published sources for reference. Verifying the accuracy and suitability of any information for your own use remains your responsibility.

© 2026 ScholarGate · A research-method reference library
  • Privacy
  • Cookies
  • Terms
  • Delete account