Health-Promoting Lifestyle Profile II
Health-Promoting Lifestyle Profile II Scale · Also known as: HPLP-II, HPLP
The Health-Promoting Lifestyle Profile II (HPLP-II) is a 52-item self-report instrument developed by Walker, Sechrist, and Pender in 1987 to assess and measure health-promoting behaviors across multiple life domains. Based on Pender's Health Promotion Model, the HPLP-II evaluates six dimensions of positive health behavior: Health Responsibility, Physical Activity, Nutrition, Spiritual Growth, Interpersonal Relations, and Stress Management. Unlike disease-focused instruments, the HPLP-II captures a comprehensive picture of wellness-oriented lifestyle practices. It is widely used in nursing research, health promotion program evaluation, population health assessment, and clinical practice to identify health strengths and areas for behavior change counseling.
Read the full method
Sign in with a free account to read this section.
Method map
The neighbourhood of related methods — select a node to explore.
When to use it
Use the HPLP-II to comprehensively assess health-promoting behaviors in clinical practice (during routine health visits, chronic disease management, wellness coaching), in health promotion program evaluation (to measure behavior change before and after a lifestyle intervention), in population health research (to characterize health behavior patterns in specific populations), and in nursing research examining predictors and outcomes of health promotion. It is particularly valuable in primary care, occupational health, cardiovascular health, diabetes prevention, and wellness programs. Choose HPLP-II when you want a holistic picture of positive health behavior rather than disease-specific risk assessment. It is less suitable for acute illness management or assessing disease-specific self-management (e.g., symptom monitoring in cancer), though it complements disease-specific instruments well.
Strengths & limitations
- Comprehensive assessment: six-domain structure captures multiple facets of health promotion, enabling holistic understanding of lifestyle beyond single behaviors like exercise or diet.
- Validated internationally: strong psychometric properties (internal consistency Cronbach α = 0.73–0.92 across subscales; test-retest reliability r = 0.80–0.88), with translated versions in Spanish, Chinese, Korean, Thai, and other languages.
- Actionable for intervention: subscale scores immediately identify priority areas for behavior change counseling; the six-domain structure aligns with evidence-based lifestyle intervention components.
- Non-stigmatizing: frames health behavior positively (what people do to promote wellness) rather than focusing on deficits or risk.
- Population sensitivity: differences in HPLP-II scores between healthy and chronically ill populations confirm it captures meaningful variation in health behavior.
- Social desirability bias: self-report of health behaviors is subject to overestimation (people may report what they should do vs. what they actually do), especially for socially valued behaviors like exercise and nutrition.
- No behavioral objective validation: scores reflect self-reported frequency, not actual performance (e.g., self-reported exercise may not correspond to measured fitness).
- Limited guidance on interpretation: no universal clinical cutoffs or severity thresholds; interpretation is comparative (relative to self over time or relative to population norms).
- Factor structure variability: the original six-factor structure has been replicated in some populations but questioned in others, with some analyses suggesting a bifactorial or altered structure.
- Limited predictive validity for health outcomes: HPLP-II scores correlate with self-reported health but show weaker associations with objective health outcomes (mortality, hospitalizations).
Frequently asked
What does a subscale mean of 2.5 really mean in practical terms?
A subscale mean of 2.5 indicates the person 'Sometimes' engages in those health behaviors and occasionally engages in them frequently. For Physical Activity with a mean of 2.5, this might translate to exercising about 2–3 days per week on average (not consistently 5+ days). The mean is an average across items; some may score 3–4 (routine exercise) and others 1–2 (rarely exercise). Review individual items to understand the pattern.
Can I use HPLP-II to diagnose a health problem or need for clinical treatment?
No. HPLP-II assesses self-reported health-promoting behavior frequency; it is not diagnostic. Low scores indicate lower engagement in health-promoting behaviors, which may be a target for coaching or intervention, but do not indicate disease or clinical dysfunction. Use HPLP-II alongside clinical assessments, not as a substitute.
Are there published norms or cutoff scores to compare an individual's score to?
Published studies report mean HPLP-II scores in various populations (healthy adults, patients with diabetes, cardiac patients, older adults), but no universal clinical cutoffs exist. Interpretation is typically comparative: comparing a person's baseline score to their score after intervention, or comparing a population's mean to published reference values from similar samples. Always report the population reference when interpreting scores.
How often should I administer HPLP-II to track lifestyle change?
For research studies evaluating interventions, baseline, post-intervention (typically 8–12 weeks), and follow-up (3–6 months) are standard. In clinical practice, annual reassessment is common during routine health visits; more frequent reassessment (monthly) is appropriate if targeting specific behavior change. Behavior change typically takes 8–12 weeks to solidify, so assess after that interval to capture meaningful change.
Sources
- Walker, S. N., Sechrist, K. R., & Pender, N. J. (1987). The Health-Promoting Lifestyle Profile: development and psychometric characteristics. Nursing Research, 36(2), 76-81. DOI: 10.1097/00006199-198703000-00002 ↗
- Walker, S. N., Pender, N. J., Sechrist, K. R., & Frank-Stromborg, M. (1995). A Spanish language version of the Health-Promoting Lifestyle Profile. Nursing Research, 44(5), 268-273. link ↗
How to cite this page
ScholarGate. (2026, June 3). Health-Promoting Lifestyle Profile II Scale. ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/en/health-behavior/health-promotion-lifestyle-profile
Which method?
Set this method beside its closest kin and read them side by side — the library lays the books on the table; the choice is yours.
- Behavioral Regulation in Exercise QuestionnaireHealth Behavior↔ compare
- Exercise Self-Efficacy ScaleHealth Behavior↔ compare
- Health Belief Model ScaleHealth Behavior↔ compare