Skip to contentScholarGate
LibraryBookshelfDeskReview StudioAssistant
Sign in
Van Westendorp Price Sensitivity Meter/Evidence
Method evidence record

Van Westendorp Price Sensitivity Meter

The Van Westendorp Price Sensitivity Meter (PSM) is a survey technique that maps the range of prices consumers find acceptable by asking four open-ended questions about what price would seem too cheap, cheap (a bargain), expensive, and too expensive for a product. Introduced by Dutch economist Peter van Westendorp at the 1976 ESOMAR congress, it rests on the idea that consumers judge price not against a single point but against internal reference boundaries, below which quality becomes suspect and above which the product seems overpriced. From respondents' answers the analyst builds four cumulative distributions and reads off their intersections, which define an optimal price point, an indifference price point, and a range of acceptable prices bounded by the points of marginal cheapness and marginal expensiveness. Unlike methods that estimate a demand curve, PSM characterizes perceived price acceptability and is especially useful early in pricing, when little is known about a new product. It is quick, intuitive, and widely used, though it measures perception rather than purchase behavior or revenue.

Sources recorded, not reviewed

Source record

Citations copied verbatim from the method’s source record. No claim-level verification is inferred from them.

Van Westendorp Price Sensitivity Meter (PSM)
Taxonomic method record · process-pipeline / marketing-research
  • Van Westendorp, P. H. (1976). NSS Price Sensitivity Meter (PSM) - A new approach to study consumer perception of prices. Proceedings of the 29th ESOMAR Congress, Venice, 139-167. · URL
  • Orme, B. K. (2020). Getting Started with Conjoint Analysis: Strategies for Product Design and Pricing Research (4th ed.). Madison, WI: Research Publishers LLC. · ISBN 9780972729772
Open full method

Curated claims

Claims persisted in the evidence ledger, each with its own assessment.

No curated claims yet

This view does not invent a claim assessment when the ledger has none.

Related methods

Generated from the method graph and shown as machine-suggested relations — no evidence claim is inferred.

Same method familyBrand-Price Trade-Offmachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Used in the same domainChoice-Based Conjointmachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Used in the same domainDiscrete Choice Experimentmachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Same method familyGabor-Granger Pricingmachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.

Evidence status

Sources recorded, not reviewed

Bibliographic sources are present. Claim-level evidence review has not been performed.

Sources

2 recorded citations, copied from the method source record.

Actions

Open method page
ScholarGate

A content-first reference library for research methods — what each one is, how it works, and where it comes from.

Open data (CC-BY)

Explore

  • Library
  • Search the library…
  • Browse by field
  • Fields
  • Journey
  • Compare
  • Which method?

Reference

  • Subjects
  • Atlas
  • Glossary
  • Methodology
  • Philosophy

Your tools

  • Bookshelf
  • Desk
  • Chat

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Contact
  • Suggest a method

Entries are compiled from published sources for reference. Verifying the accuracy and suitability of any information for your own use remains your responsibility.

© 2026 ScholarGate · A research-method reference library
  • Privacy
  • Cookies
  • Terms
  • Delete account