Skip to contentScholarGate
LibraryBookshelfDeskReview StudioAssistant
Sign in
TURF Analysis/Evidence
Method evidence record

TURF Analysis

TURF analysis — Total Unduplicated Reach and Frequency — answers a portfolio question: which limited set of products, flavors, features, or messages reaches the largest number of distinct customers with at least one option they like? The reach-and-frequency idea originated in media planning, where reach is the share of an audience exposed at least once and frequency is the average number of exposures, and was carried into product-line research by Gene Miaoulis and colleagues. The defining word is 'unduplicated': a customer who likes three items in the set is still only one person reached, so TURF rewards complementary, non-overlapping appeal rather than piling up popular-but-redundant items. Daniel Serra formalized the selection problem as binary linear programming, showing it can be solved exactly and efficiently even for large candidate sets instead of relying on exhaustive enumeration. Wedel and Kamakura situate TURF within assortment and segmentation strategy as a tool for choosing a product line that covers a heterogeneous market. The output is a recommended assortment of a chosen size together with its reach curve, guiding line extensions, menu design, and message portfolios.

Sources recorded, not reviewed

Source record

Citations copied verbatim from the method’s source record. No claim-level verification is inferred from them.

TURF Analysis (Total Unduplicated Reach and Frequency)
Taxonomic method record · process-pipeline / marketing-science
  • Serra, D. (2013). Implementing TURF analysis through binary linear programming. Food Quality and Preference, 28(1), 382-388. · DOI 10.1016/j.foodqual.2012.10.001
  • Wedel, M., & Kamakura, W. A. (2000). Market Segmentation: Conceptual and Methodological Foundations (2nd ed.). Springer (Kluwer Academic). · ISBN 9781461371045
Open full method

Curated claims

Claims persisted in the evidence ledger, each with its own assessment.

No curated claims yet

This view does not invent a claim assessment when the ledger has none.

Related methods

Generated from the method graph and shown as machine-suggested relations — no evidence claim is inferred.

Same method familyImportance-Performance Analysismachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Used in the same domainLatent-Class Choice Segmentationmachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Same method familyVoice of Customer Analysismachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.

Evidence status

Sources recorded, not reviewed

Bibliographic sources are present. Claim-level evidence review has not been performed.

Sources

2 recorded citations, copied from the method source record.

Actions

Open method page
ScholarGate

A content-first reference library for research methods — what each one is, how it works, and where it comes from.

Open data (CC-BY)

Explore

  • Library
  • Search the library…
  • Browse by field
  • Fields
  • Journey
  • Compare
  • Which method?

Reference

  • Subjects
  • Atlas
  • Glossary
  • Methodology
  • Philosophy

Your tools

  • Bookshelf
  • Desk
  • Chat

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Contact
  • Suggest a method

Entries are compiled from published sources for reference. Verifying the accuracy and suitability of any information for your own use remains your responsibility.

© 2026 ScholarGate · A research-method reference library
  • Privacy
  • Cookies
  • Terms
  • Delete account