Skip to contentScholarGate
LibraryBookshelfDeskReview StudioAssistant
Sign in
Targeted Maximum Likelihood Estimation (Epidemiology)/Evidence
Method evidence record

Targeted Maximum Likelihood Estimation (Epidemiology)

Targeted maximum likelihood estimation (TMLE), introduced by Mark van der Laan and Daniel Rubin in 2006, is a doubly-robust, semiparametric framework for estimating causal effects that marries machine learning with the theory of efficient influence functions. It begins by flexibly estimating two nuisance quantities — the outcome regression and the propensity score — typically with an ensemble 'super learner,' and then performs a clever targeting step that nudges the outcome model in exactly the direction needed to remove plug-in bias for the causal parameter of interest. The result is a substitution estimator that is consistent if either the outcome model or the propensity model is correct (double robustness) and asymptotically efficient if both are, all while permitting aggressive data-adaptive estimation. Schuler and Rose's 2017 American Journal of Epidemiology tutorial brought TMLE to a broad epidemiologic audience, including social-epidemiologic applications where confounding structures are complex and functional forms unknown.

Sources recorded, not reviewed

Source record

Citations copied verbatim from the method’s source record. No claim-level verification is inferred from them.

Targeted Maximum Likelihood Estimation (Doubly-Robust Causal Effect Estimation with Super Learner)
Taxonomic method record · ml-model / social-epidemiology
  • van der Laan, M. J., & Rubin, D. (2006). Targeted maximum likelihood learning. The International Journal of Biostatistics, 2(1), Article 11. · DOI 10.2202/1557-4679.1043
  • Schuler, M. S., & Rose, S. (2017). Targeted maximum likelihood estimation for causal inference in observational studies. American Journal of Epidemiology, 185(1), 65-73. · DOI 10.1093/aje/kww165
Open full method

Curated claims

Claims persisted in the evidence ledger, each with its own assessment.

No curated claims yet

This view does not invent a claim assessment when the ledger has none.

Related methods

Generated from the method graph and shown as machine-suggested relations — no evidence claim is inferred.

Used in the same domainE-Value Sensitivity Analysismachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Often confused withMarginal Structural Model (IPTW)machine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Often confused withParametric g-Formulamachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.

Evidence status

Sources recorded, not reviewed

Bibliographic sources are present. Claim-level evidence review has not been performed.

Sources

2 recorded citations, copied from the method source record.

Actions

Open method page
ScholarGate

A content-first reference library for research methods — what each one is, how it works, and where it comes from.

Open data (CC-BY)

Explore

  • Library
  • Search the library…
  • Browse by field
  • Fields
  • Journey
  • Compare
  • Which method?

Reference

  • Subjects
  • Atlas
  • Glossary
  • Methodology
  • Philosophy

Your tools

  • Bookshelf
  • Desk
  • Chat

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Contact
  • Suggest a method

Entries are compiled from published sources for reference. Verifying the accuracy and suitability of any information for your own use remains your responsibility.

© 2026 ScholarGate · A research-method reference library
  • Privacy
  • Cookies
  • Terms
  • Delete account