Skip to contentScholarGate
LibraryBookshelfDeskReview StudioAssistant
Sign in
Slope Index of Inequality/Evidence
Method evidence record

Slope Index of Inequality

The slope index of inequality (SII) is a regression-based summary measure that expresses the absolute difference in a health outcome between the bottom and the top of the socioeconomic hierarchy. Rather than comparing only the most extreme groups - which discards information and is sensitive to how categories are defined - it regresses the outcome on each group's relative position in the cumulative socioeconomic distribution and reads the inequality off the fitted line. Mackenbach and Kunst's 1997 Social Science & Medicine overview made the SII, together with its relative counterpart, the recommended pair of measures for quantifying socioeconomic inequalities in health because they use the whole population and account for group sizes. The SII is measured in the natural units of the outcome - extra deaths per 100,000, additional percentage points of disease prevalence - which makes it directly meaningful for public-health and policy audiences. Wagstaff, Paci, and van Doorslaer had earlier argued that such regression-on-rank measures, alongside the concentration index, are among the few that properly reflect the socioeconomic dimension of health. The SII has become a standard tool in health-inequality monitoring across Europe and beyond.

Sources recorded, not reviewed

Source record

Citations copied verbatim from the method’s source record. No claim-level verification is inferred from them.

Slope Index of Inequality (SII)
Taxonomic method record · regression-model / social-epidemiology
  • Mackenbach, J. P., & Kunst, A. E. (1997). Measuring the magnitude of socio-economic inequalities in health: an overview of available measures illustrated with two examples from Europe. Social Science & Medicine, 44(6), 757-771. · DOI 10.1016/S0277-9536(96)00073-1
  • Wagstaff, A., Paci, P., & van Doorslaer, E. (1991). On the measurement of inequalities in health. Social Science & Medicine, 33(5), 545-557. · DOI 10.1016/0277-9536(91)90212-U
Open full method

Curated claims

Claims persisted in the evidence ledger, each with its own assessment.

No curated claims yet

This view does not invent a claim assessment when the ledger has none.

Related methods

Generated from the method graph and shown as machine-suggested relations — no evidence claim is inferred.

Used in the same domainConcentration Indexmachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Same method familyOaxaca-Blinder Health Decompositionmachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Taxonomic bucketRelative Index of Inequalitymachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Used in the same domainTheil Index for Health Inequalitymachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.

Evidence status

Sources recorded, not reviewed

Bibliographic sources are present. Claim-level evidence review has not been performed.

Sources

2 recorded citations, copied from the method source record.

Actions

Open method page
ScholarGate

A content-first reference library for research methods — what each one is, how it works, and where it comes from.

Open data (CC-BY)

Explore

  • Library
  • Search the library…
  • Browse by field
  • Fields
  • Journey
  • Compare
  • Which method?

Reference

  • Subjects
  • Atlas
  • Glossary
  • Methodology
  • Philosophy

Your tools

  • Bookshelf
  • Desk
  • Chat

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Contact
  • Suggest a method

Entries are compiled from published sources for reference. Verifying the accuracy and suitability of any information for your own use remains your responsibility.

© 2026 ScholarGate · A research-method reference library
  • Privacy
  • Cookies
  • Terms
  • Delete account