Skip to contentScholarGate
LibraryBookshelfDeskReview StudioAssistant
Sign in
Sign Language Corpus Analysis/Evidence
Method evidence record

Sign Language Corpus Analysis

Sign language corpus analysis is the methodology for building and studying machine-readable, multimedia collections of signed languages, the natural visual-spatial languages of deaf communities. Because signed languages have no widely used written form, a corpus cannot be a body of text; it must be a structured collection of video recordings of deaf signers, layered with time-aligned annotation that makes the language searchable and analyzable. Trevor Johnston's 2010 account of moving from archive to corpus set out the central methodological principles, most notably ID-glossing, in which every instance of a sign is annotated with a single stable identifier linked to a lexical database so that all tokens of the same sign can be found and counted. The pipeline records signing on video, segments and ID-glosses it, links those glosses to a lexicon, aligns multiple annotation tiers to the video timeline, and then supports quantitative, corpus-based analysis of frequency, variation, and grammar. The result turns a fragile collection of recordings into reusable empirical evidence about how a signed language is actually used.

Sources recorded, not reviewed

Source record

Citations copied verbatim from the method’s source record. No claim-level verification is inferred from them.

Sign Language Corpus Construction and Analysis
Taxonomic method record · process-pipeline / disability-studies
  • Johnston, T. (2010). From archive to corpus: transcription and annotation in the creation of signed language corpora. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 15(1), 106-131. · DOI 10.1075/ijcl.15.1.05joh
Open full method

Curated claims

Claims persisted in the evidence ledger, each with its own assessment.

No curated claims yet

This view does not invent a claim assessment when the ledger has none.

Related methods

Generated from the method graph and shown as machine-suggested relations — no evidence claim is inferred.

Same method familyAugmentative and Alternative Communication Assessmentmachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.

Evidence status

Sources recorded, not reviewed

Bibliographic sources are present. Claim-level evidence review has not been performed.

Sources

1 recorded citation, copied from the method source record.

Actions

Open method page
ScholarGate

A content-first reference library for research methods — what each one is, how it works, and where it comes from.

Open data (CC-BY)

Explore

  • Library
  • Search the library…
  • Browse by field
  • Fields
  • Journey
  • Compare
  • Which method?

Reference

  • Subjects
  • Atlas
  • Glossary
  • Methodology
  • Philosophy

Your tools

  • Bookshelf
  • Desk
  • Chat

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Contact
  • Suggest a method

Entries are compiled from published sources for reference. Verifying the accuracy and suitability of any information for your own use remains your responsibility.

© 2026 ScholarGate · A research-method reference library
  • Privacy
  • Cookies
  • Terms
  • Delete account