Skip to contentScholarGate
LibraryBookshelfDeskReview StudioAssistant
Sign in
Share of Wallet Analysis/Evidence
Method evidence record

Share of Wallet Analysis

Share of wallet (SOW) analysis measures the proportion of a customer's total category spending that a particular brand or firm captures, shifting attention from how many customers a firm has to how much of each customer it owns. Unlike overall market share, share of wallet is a customer-level loyalty metric: a customer might buy from you regularly yet give most of their category budget to a competitor, a vulnerability that absolute sales figures hide. Bruce Cooil, Timothy Keiningham, Lerzan Aksoy and colleagues established in longitudinal work that changes in customer satisfaction drive changes in share of wallet, moderated by customer characteristics. Building on this, Keiningham and colleagues introduced the Wallet Allocation Rule, which predicts a customer's share of wallet from how the brand ranks against the competitors that customer uses and how many brands they use, arguing that relative rank, not absolute satisfaction, is what governs spending allocation. Share of wallet analysis thus combines measurement (estimating each customer's category spend and the slice you capture) with a predictive rule that turns competitive standing into expected wallet share, helping firms find growth inside their existing customer base.

Sources recorded, not reviewed

Source record

Citations copied verbatim from the method’s source record. No claim-level verification is inferred from them.

Share of Wallet (SOW) Analysis and the Wallet Allocation Rule
Taxonomic method record · process-pipeline / marketing
  • Cooil, B., Keiningham, T. L., Aksoy, L., & Hsu, M. (2007). A Longitudinal Analysis of Customer Satisfaction and Share of Wallet: Investigating the Moderating Effect of Customer Characteristics. Journal of Marketing, 71(1), 67-83. · DOI 10.1509/jmkg.71.1.067
  • Keiningham, T. L., Aksoy, L., Williams, L., & Buoye, A. J. (2015). The Wallet Allocation Rule: Winning the Battle for Share. Wiley. · ISBN 9781119037316
Open full method

Curated claims

Claims persisted in the evidence ledger, each with its own assessment.

No curated claims yet

This view does not invent a claim assessment when the ledger has none.

Related methods

Generated from the method graph and shown as machine-suggested relations — no evidence claim is inferred.

Same method familyCustomer Equity Modelingmachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Same method familyCustomer Lifetime Valuemachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Used in the same domainNBD-Dirichlet Modelmachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Same method familyRFM Analysismachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.

Evidence status

Sources recorded, not reviewed

Bibliographic sources are present. Claim-level evidence review has not been performed.

Sources

2 recorded citations, copied from the method source record.

Actions

Open method page
ScholarGate

A content-first reference library for research methods — what each one is, how it works, and where it comes from.

Open data (CC-BY)

Explore

  • Library
  • Search the library…
  • Browse by field
  • Fields
  • Journey
  • Compare
  • Which method?

Reference

  • Subjects
  • Atlas
  • Glossary
  • Methodology
  • Philosophy

Your tools

  • Bookshelf
  • Desk
  • Chat

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Contact
  • Suggest a method

Entries are compiled from published sources for reference. Verifying the accuracy and suitability of any information for your own use remains your responsibility.

© 2026 ScholarGate · A research-method reference library
  • Privacy
  • Cookies
  • Terms
  • Delete account