Skip to contentScholarGate
LibraryBookshelfDeskReview StudioAssistant
Sign in
Scratch Wound Assay/Evidence
Method evidence record

Scratch Wound Assay

The scratch wound assay (also called the wound healing assay or gap closure assay) is a simple, cost-effective method for measuring cell migration in vitro. Developed and standardized by Liang, Park, and Guan in 2007, the assay involves creating a defined gap (wound) in a monolayer of confluent cells using a pipette tip or specialized tool, then monitoring the rate at which cells migrate into the gap over hours to days. The scratch wound assay is widely used to evaluate the effects of growth factors, inhibitory compounds, and biomaterial extracts on cell motility and wound healing potential.

Sources recorded, not reviewed

Source record

Citations copied verbatim from the method’s source record. No claim-level verification is inferred from them.

Scratch Wound Cell Migration Assay
Taxonomic method record · process-pipeline / biomaterials
  • Liang, C. C., Park, A. Y., & Guan, J. L. (2007). In vitro scratch assay: a convenient and inexpensive method for analysis of cell migration in vitro. Nature Protocols, 2(2), 329-333. · DOI 10.1038/nprot.2007.30
  • Jonkman, J. E. N., Cathcart, J. A., Xu, F., et al. (2014). An introduction to the wound healing assay using live-cell microscopy. Cell Adhesion & Migration, 8(5), 440-451. · DOI 10.4161/cam.36224
  • Rodriguez, L. G., Wu, X., & Guan, J. L. (2009). Wound-healing assay. In Cell Migration: Developmental Methods and Protocols. Humana Press, pp. 23-29. · DOI 10.1385/1-59259-860-9:023
Open full method

Curated claims

Claims persisted in the evidence ledger, each with its own assessment.

No curated claims yet

This view does not invent a claim assessment when the ledger has none.

Related methods

Generated from the method graph and shown as machine-suggested relations — no evidence claim is inferred.

Same method familyBMP Releasemachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Same method familyLive/Dead Assaymachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Same method familyMTT/MTS Assaymachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Same method familyTranswell Assaymachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.

Evidence status

Sources recorded, not reviewed

Bibliographic sources are present. Claim-level evidence review has not been performed.

Sources

3 recorded citations, copied from the method source record.

Actions

Open method page
ScholarGate

A content-first reference library for research methods — what each one is, how it works, and where it comes from.

Open data (CC-BY)

Explore

  • Library
  • Search the library…
  • Browse by field
  • Fields
  • Journey
  • Compare
  • Which method?

Reference

  • Subjects
  • Atlas
  • Glossary
  • Methodology
  • Philosophy

Your tools

  • Bookshelf
  • Desk
  • Chat

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Contact
  • Suggest a method

Entries are compiled from published sources for reference. Verifying the accuracy and suitability of any information for your own use remains your responsibility.

© 2026 ScholarGate · A research-method reference library
  • Privacy
  • Cookies
  • Terms
  • Delete account