Skip to contentScholarGate
LibraryBookshelfDeskReview StudioAssistant
Sign in
Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale/Evidence
Method evidence record

Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale

The Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale (RASS), developed by Sessler et al. in 2002, is a 10-level ordinal scale for assessing level of consciousness, agitation, and sedation in critically ill patients. It ranges from +4 (combative/violent) through 0 (alert and calm) to -5 (unarousable), enabling precise titration of sedative and analgesic medications in ICU settings.

Sources recorded, not reviewed

Source record

Citations copied verbatim from the method’s source record. No claim-level verification is inferred from them.

Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale (RASS)
Taxonomic method record · process-pipeline / clinical-assessment
  • Sessler, C. N., Gosnell, M. S., Grap, M. J., et al. (2002). The Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale: validity and reliability in adult intensive care unit patients. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, 166(10), 1338-1344. · DOI 10.1164/rccm.2107138
  • Ely, E. W., Inouye, S. K., Bernard, G. R., et al. (2003). Delirium in mechanically ventilated patients: validity and reliability of the confusion assessment method for the ICU (CAM-ICU). JAMA, 286(21), 2703-2710. · DOI 10.1001/jama.286.21.2703
Open full method

Curated claims

Claims persisted in the evidence ledger, each with its own assessment.

No curated claims yet

This view does not invent a claim assessment when the ledger has none.

Related methods

Generated from the method graph and shown as machine-suggested relations — no evidence claim is inferred.

Taxonomic bucketBehavioral Pain Scalemachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Taxonomic bucketGlasgow Coma Scalemachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Taxonomic bucketModified Early Warning Scoremachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.

Evidence status

Sources recorded, not reviewed

Bibliographic sources are present. Claim-level evidence review has not been performed.

Sources

2 recorded citations, copied from the method source record.

Actions

Open method page
ScholarGate

A content-first reference library for research methods — what each one is, how it works, and where it comes from.

Open data (CC-BY)

Explore

  • Library
  • Search the library…
  • Browse by field
  • Fields
  • Journey
  • Compare
  • Which method?

Reference

  • Subjects
  • Atlas
  • Glossary
  • Methodology
  • Philosophy

Your tools

  • Bookshelf
  • Desk
  • Chat

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Contact
  • Suggest a method

Entries are compiled from published sources for reference. Verifying the accuracy and suitability of any information for your own use remains your responsibility.

© 2026 ScholarGate · A research-method reference library
  • Privacy
  • Cookies
  • Terms
  • Delete account