Repeat Victimization Analysis
Repeat victimization analysis studies the sharply elevated short-term risk that the same target — a household, person, or business — is victimized again soon after an initial offense. Established as a crime-prevention priority by Ken Pease, Graham Farrell, and colleagues in the early 1990s, it models the time-course of re-victimization, quantifies how the hazard of a repeat decays as time passes since the first event, and asks whether repeats arise because an event 'boosts' future risk or because stable target features 'flag' that risk.
Source record
Citations copied verbatim from the method’s source record. No claim-level verification is inferred from them.
- Tseloni, A., & Pease, K. (2003). Repeat personal victimization: 'Boosts' or 'flags'? British Journal of Criminology, 43(1), 196–212. · DOI 10.1093/bjc/43.1.196
- Farrell, G., & Pease, K. (1993). Once Bitten, Twice Bitten: Repeat Victimisation and its Implications for Crime Prevention. Home Office Crime Prevention Unit Paper 46. London: Home Office. · URL
Curated claims
Claims persisted in the evidence ledger, each with its own assessment.
This view does not invent a claim assessment when the ledger has none.
Related methods
Generated from the method graph and shown as machine-suggested relations — no evidence claim is inferred.