Registry-Based Research
Registry-based research uses systematically collected clinical data from patient registries—organized databases of patients with a specific disease or condition—to conduct observational studies. Registries began in the mid-20th century but have proliferated since the 2000s as electronic health records expanded and funding agencies recognized their value for real-world evidence generation. Registry studies provide large, diverse, representative populations without the cost of recruiting and following prospectively, enabling rapid generation of clinical evidence.
Source record
Citations copied verbatim from the method’s source record. No claim-level verification is inferred from them.
- Gini, R., Francesconi, P., Mazzaglia, G., Brignoli, G., Cricelli, C., Lapi, F., & Cricelli, A. (2020). Chronic disease prevalence from Italian administrative databases: the PREVALENTIST study. BMC Public Health, 13, 191. · URL
- Hoque, D. M. E., Ruseckaite, R., Braithwaite, J., & Ting, H. P. (2017). Quality of life measurement in patients with Parkinson's disease: a systematic review of generic and disease-specific instruments and their clinimetric properties. Quality of Life Research, 26(8), 2117–2130. · URL
- Ikehara, S., Iso, H., Yamagishi, K., Yamagishi, K., Maruyama, K., & Inoue, M. (2016). Healthy lifestyle and life expectancy among Japanese adults: findings from the JPHC study. Journal of Epidemiology, 26(2), 88–97. · URL
Curated claims
Claims persisted in the evidence ledger, each with its own assessment.
This view does not invent a claim assessment when the ledger has none.
Related methods
Generated from the method graph and shown as machine-suggested relations — no evidence claim is inferred.