Recreation Substitutability Analysis
Recreation substitutability analysis studies the interchangeability of leisure experiences, asking when and for whom one recreation activity, site, or time can acceptably replace another. Bo Shelby and Jerry Vaske's work, exemplified by their 1991 study of salmon fishing in New Zealand, organized substitution into distinct types, varying the activity, the resource or setting, the timing, or the strategy of participation, and measured anglers' willingness to accept each kind of substitute when their preferred option was unavailable. Seppo Iso-Ahola's 1986 theory framed substitution as a psychological process in which perceived freedom of choice is the critical mediator: people substitute more willingly when they feel they are choosing rather than being forced, and when the alternative shares the valued qualities of the original. The analysis combines a typology of substitution with measures of willingness conditioned on choice freedom, the quality of alternatives, and recreationists' specialization and commitment.
Source record
Citations copied verbatim from the method’s source record. No claim-level verification is inferred from them.
- Shelby, B., & Vaske, J. J. (1991). Resource and Activity Substitutes for Recreational Salmon Fishing in New Zealand. Leisure Sciences, 13(1), 21-32. · DOI 10.1080/01490409109513122
- Iso-Ahola, S. E. (1986). A Theory of Substitutability of Leisure Behavior. Leisure Sciences, 8(4), 367-389. · DOI 10.1080/01490408609513081
Curated claims
Claims persisted in the evidence ledger, each with its own assessment.
This view does not invent a claim assessment when the ledger has none.
Related methods
Generated from the method graph and shown as machine-suggested relations — no evidence claim is inferred.