Skip to contentScholarGate
LibraryBookshelfDeskReview StudioAssistant
Sign in
Recreation Conflict and Coping Assessment/Evidence
Method evidence record

Recreation Conflict and Coping Assessment

Recreation conflict and coping assessment is a field-survey pipeline for diagnosing why recreationists experience conflict with others in shared settings and how they respond. Its theoretical core is Jacob and Schreyer's 1980 definition of conflict as 'goal interference attributed to another's behavior,' which shifts the focus from mere crowding to the meaning a clash of activities has for the people involved, and which explains the well-known asymmetry of conflict — for example, that canoeists may feel conflict toward motorboaters who feel none in return. Jacob and Schreyer trace interference to four preconditions: activity style, resource specificity, mode of experience, and lifestyle tolerance. Schuster, Hammitt, and Moore's 2003 stress-appraisal-and-coping model extends the framework to the response side, modeling how recreationists appraise interference as stress and deploy problem-focused and emotion-focused coping such as displacement, product shift, and rationalization.

Sources recorded, not reviewed

Source record

Citations copied verbatim from the method’s source record. No claim-level verification is inferred from them.

Recreation Conflict and Coping Assessment (Goal Interference and Coping Response)
Taxonomic method record · process-pipeline / sport-leisure-studies
  • Jacob, G. R., & Schreyer, R. (1980). Conflict in Outdoor Recreation: A Theoretical Perspective. Journal of Leisure Research, 12(4), 368-380. · DOI 10.1080/00222216.1980.11969462
  • Schuster, R. M., Hammitt, W. E., & Moore, D. (2003). A Theoretical Model to Measure the Appraisal and Coping Response to Hassles in Outdoor Recreation Settings. Leisure Sciences, 25(2-3), 277-299. · DOI 10.1080/01490400306568
Open full method

Curated claims

Claims persisted in the evidence ledger, each with its own assessment.

No curated claims yet

This view does not invent a claim assessment when the ledger has none.

Related methods

Generated from the method graph and shown as machine-suggested relations — no evidence claim is inferred.

Same method familyCrowding Norm Curve Analysismachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Same method familyEncounter Norm Analysismachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Same method familyRecreation Specialization Continuummachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Same method familyRecreation Substitutability Analysismachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.

Evidence status

Sources recorded, not reviewed

Bibliographic sources are present. Claim-level evidence review has not been performed.

Sources

2 recorded citations, copied from the method source record.

Actions

Open method page
ScholarGate

A content-first reference library for research methods — what each one is, how it works, and where it comes from.

Open data (CC-BY)

Explore

  • Library
  • Search the library…
  • Browse by field
  • Fields
  • Journey
  • Compare
  • Which method?

Reference

  • Subjects
  • Atlas
  • Glossary
  • Methodology
  • Philosophy

Your tools

  • Bookshelf
  • Desk
  • Chat

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Contact
  • Suggest a method

Entries are compiled from published sources for reference. Verifying the accuracy and suitability of any information for your own use remains your responsibility.

© 2026 ScholarGate · A research-method reference library
  • Privacy
  • Cookies
  • Terms
  • Delete account