Skip to contentScholarGate
LibraryBookshelfDeskReview StudioAssistant
Sign in
Randomization Test for Single-Case Designs/Evidence
Method evidence record

Randomization Test for Single-Case Designs

The randomization test for single-case experimental designs is a permutation-based procedure that yields a valid statistical p-value for an intervention effect in a single participant, provided that some experimentally controllable feature of the design — typically the moment the intervention begins or the order in which conditions are presented — was randomly determined before data were collected. Eugene Edgington showed in 1980 that this design-embedded randomization is what licenses inference: because the random assignment is the source of the test's probability statements, the procedure draws valid conclusions without assuming that the data are normally distributed or serially independent, two assumptions that single-case time-series data routinely violate. Edgington and Onghena's monograph established the modern framework, in which the observed test statistic is referred to the distribution of statistics generated by every admissible re-assignment of the data. In disability research, where interventions are often delivered to one person at a time and group designs are impractical, the randomization test provides a defensible significance test that complements visual analysis.

Sources recorded, not reviewed

Source record

Citations copied verbatim from the method’s source record. No claim-level verification is inferred from them.

Randomization Test for Single-Case Experimental Designs (Edgington Permutation Inference)
Taxonomic method record · process-pipeline / disability-studies
  • Edgington, E. S. (1980). Validity of Randomization Tests for One-Subject Experiments. Journal of Educational Statistics, 5(3), 235-251. · DOI 10.3102/10769986005003235
  • Edgington, E. S., & Onghena, P. (2007). Randomization Tests (4th ed.). Chapman & Hall/CRC. · ISBN 9781584885894
Open full method

Curated claims

Claims persisted in the evidence ledger, each with its own assessment.

No curated claims yet

This view does not invent a claim assessment when the ledger has none.

Related methods

Generated from the method graph and shown as machine-suggested relations — no evidence claim is inferred.

Same method familySingle-Case Experimental Designmachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Often confused withStandardized Mean Difference for Single-Case Designsmachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.

Evidence status

Sources recorded, not reviewed

Bibliographic sources are present. Claim-level evidence review has not been performed.

Sources

2 recorded citations, copied from the method source record.

Actions

Open method page
ScholarGate

A content-first reference library for research methods — what each one is, how it works, and where it comes from.

Open data (CC-BY)

Explore

  • Library
  • Search the library…
  • Browse by field
  • Fields
  • Journey
  • Compare
  • Which method?

Reference

  • Subjects
  • Atlas
  • Glossary
  • Methodology
  • Philosophy

Your tools

  • Bookshelf
  • Desk
  • Chat

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Contact
  • Suggest a method

Entries are compiled from published sources for reference. Verifying the accuracy and suitability of any information for your own use remains your responsibility.

© 2026 ScholarGate · A research-method reference library
  • Privacy
  • Cookies
  • Terms
  • Delete account