Predatory Journals and Publishers
Predatory journals are fake academic publishers that exploit the open-access model by charging authors publication fees without providing peer review, editorial oversight, or quality control. Coined by librarian Jeffrey Beall in 2010, the term describes publishers that prioritize profit over scientific integrity, accepting nearly all submissions (regardless of quality), using deceptive marketing (claiming high impact factors, faking indexing, using names similar to established journals), and often hosting work that would not survive peer review. Publishing in predatory journals damages an author's credibility and wastes research dissemination efforts.
Source record
Citations copied verbatim from the method’s source record. No claim-level verification is inferred from them.
- Beall, J. (2010). Predatory Open-Access Scholarly Publishers. The Charleston Advisor, 11(4), 10–17. · URL
- Beall, J. (2015). Scholarly Open Access: Critical Analysis of Bibliometric Indicators and Journal Quality. PeerJ Preprints, 3, e1481. · URL
- Lak, A., Sarvari, S. A., Kassaian, N., & Salari, P. (2016). Identifying Predatory Journals. Asian Journal of Transfusion Science, 10(2), 184–185. · URL
Curated claims
Claims persisted in the evidence ledger, each with its own assessment.
This view does not invent a claim assessment when the ledger has none.
Related methods
Generated from the method graph and shown as machine-suggested relations — no evidence claim is inferred.