Skip to contentScholarGate
LibraryBookshelfDeskReview StudioAssistant
Sign in
Predatory Journals and Publishers/Evidence
Method evidence record

Predatory Journals and Publishers

Predatory journals are fake academic publishers that exploit the open-access model by charging authors publication fees without providing peer review, editorial oversight, or quality control. Coined by librarian Jeffrey Beall in 2010, the term describes publishers that prioritize profit over scientific integrity, accepting nearly all submissions (regardless of quality), using deceptive marketing (claiming high impact factors, faking indexing, using names similar to established journals), and often hosting work that would not survive peer review. Publishing in predatory journals damages an author's credibility and wastes research dissemination efforts.

Sources recorded, not reviewed

Source record

Citations copied verbatim from the method’s source record. No claim-level verification is inferred from them.

Identification and Avoidance of Predatory Journals and Publishers
Taxonomic method record · process-pipeline / publication-ethics
  • Beall, J. (2010). Predatory Open-Access Scholarly Publishers. The Charleston Advisor, 11(4), 10–17. · URL
  • Beall, J. (2015). Scholarly Open Access: Critical Analysis of Bibliometric Indicators and Journal Quality. PeerJ Preprints, 3, e1481. · URL
  • Lak, A., Sarvari, S. A., Kassaian, N., & Salari, P. (2016). Identifying Predatory Journals. Asian Journal of Transfusion Science, 10(2), 184–185. · URL
Open full method

Curated claims

Claims persisted in the evidence ledger, each with its own assessment.

No curated claims yet

This view does not invent a claim assessment when the ledger has none.

Related methods

Generated from the method graph and shown as machine-suggested relations — no evidence claim is inferred.

Same method familyArticle Retraction Processmachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Same method familyCOPE Guidelines for Publication Ethicsmachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Same method familyOpen Access Publishing Modelsmachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Same method familyPeer Review Processmachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.

Evidence status

Sources recorded, not reviewed

Bibliographic sources are present. Claim-level evidence review has not been performed.

Sources

3 recorded citations, copied from the method source record.

Actions

Open method page
ScholarGate

A content-first reference library for research methods — what each one is, how it works, and where it comes from.

Open data (CC-BY)

Explore

  • Library
  • Search the library…
  • Browse by field
  • Fields
  • Journey
  • Compare
  • Which method?

Reference

  • Subjects
  • Atlas
  • Glossary
  • Methodology
  • Philosophy

Your tools

  • Bookshelf
  • Desk
  • Chat

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Contact
  • Suggest a method

Entries are compiled from published sources for reference. Verifying the accuracy and suitability of any information for your own use remains your responsibility.

© 2026 ScholarGate · A research-method reference library
  • Privacy
  • Cookies
  • Terms
  • Delete account