Pragmatic diagnostic accuracy study
A pragmatic diagnostic accuracy study evaluates how well a diagnostic test performs under real-world clinical conditions — not in idealized, tightly controlled settings. Conducted within routine care workflows, it measures sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, and likelihood ratios for an index test against a reference standard, yielding accuracy estimates directly applicable to clinical practice rather than laboratory benchmarks.
Source record
Citations copied verbatim from the method’s source record. No claim-level verification is inferred from them.
- Bossuyt, P. M., et al. (2015). STARD 2015: An Updated List of Essential Items for Reporting Diagnostic Accuracy Studies. BMJ, 351, h5527. · DOI 10.1136/bmj.h5527
- Schilling, I., & Burchardt, M. (2018). Pragmatic diagnostic accuracy studies: bridging the gap between explanatory trials and routine practice. Diagnostic and Prognostic Research, 2(1), 14. · URL
Curated claims
Claims persisted in the evidence ledger, each with its own assessment.
This view does not invent a claim assessment when the ledger has none.
Related methods
Generated from the method graph and shown as machine-suggested relations — no evidence claim is inferred.