Method evidence record

Policy Implementation Analysis

Policy implementation analysis studies what happens between the moment a policy is decided and the moment it reaches its intended effect, asking why outcomes so often fall short of stated objectives. The field was founded by Jeffrey Pressman and Aaron Wildavsky's 1973 study of a federal employment program in Oakland, which showed how a long chain of required agreements and clearances steadily eroded great expectations. The method traces the implementation chain — the actors, decision points and conditions through which a policy must pass — to locate where and why it succeeds or fails. Its central object is the implementation gap between policy as legislated and policy as delivered.

Sources recorded, not reviewed

Source record

Citations copied verbatim from the method’s source record. No claim-level verification is inferred from them.

Policy Implementation Analysis of the Policy-to-Practice Gap

Taxonomic method record · process-pipeline / public-administration

Pressman, J. L., & Wildavsky, A. (1973). Implementation: How Great Expectations in Washington Are Dashed in Oakland. Berkeley: University of California Press. · ISBN 9780520053311
Mazmanian, D. A., & Sabatier, P. A. (1983). Implementation and Public Policy. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman. · ISBN 9780819133663

Open full method

Curated claims

Claims persisted in the evidence ledger, each with its own assessment.

No curated claims yet

This view does not invent a claim assessment when the ledger has none.

Related methods

Generated from the method graph and shown as machine-suggested relations — no evidence claim is inferred.

Same method familyAdministrative Burden Analysismachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Same method familyCollaborative Governance Assessmentmachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Same method familyRealist Evaluationmachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Same method familyStreet-Level Bureaucracy Analysismachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.