Skip to contentScholarGate
LibraryBookshelfDeskReview StudioAssistant
Sign in
Percentage of Non-Overlapping Data/Evidence
Method evidence record

Percentage of Non-Overlapping Data

The percentage of non-overlapping data (PND) is a simple nonoverlap effect-size index for single-case (single-subject) research, introduced by Scruggs, Mastropieri, and Casto in 1987 to enable quantitative synthesis of studies that report data graphically rather than as group statistics. PND quantifies how strongly an intervention shifted a behavior by computing the percentage of intervention-phase data points that exceed the single most extreme baseline data point in the direction of desired change. Because it requires only the graphed data and a ruler, PND became one of the most widely used effect sizes in meta-analyses of single-case research in special education, rehabilitation, and behavior analysis. Its very simplicity, however, brings well-documented weaknesses — a ceiling at 100 percent, extreme sensitivity to a single outlying baseline point, and blindness to trend — which motivated later nonoverlap-plus-trend indices such as Parker and colleagues' 2011 Tau-U. PND is best understood as a fast, interpretable, but coarse first look at single-case effect magnitude.

Sources recorded, not reviewed

Source record

Citations copied verbatim from the method’s source record. No claim-level verification is inferred from them.

Percentage of Non-Overlapping Data (PND Nonoverlap Effect-Size Index for Single-Case Research)
Taxonomic method record · process-pipeline / disability-studies
  • Scruggs, T. E., Mastropieri, M. A., & Casto, G. (1987). The quantitative synthesis of single-subject research: Methodology and validation. Remedial and Special Education, 8(2), 24-33. · DOI 10.1177/074193258700800206
  • Parker, R. I., Vannest, K. J., Davis, J. L., & Sauber, S. B. (2011). Combining nonoverlap and trend for single-case research: Tau-U. Behavior Therapy, 42(2), 284-299. · DOI 10.1016/j.beth.2010.08.006
Open full method

Curated claims

Claims persisted in the evidence ledger, each with its own assessment.

No curated claims yet

This view does not invent a claim assessment when the ledger has none.

Related methods

Generated from the method graph and shown as machine-suggested relations — no evidence claim is inferred.

Same method familyAlternating Treatments Designmachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Same method familyChanging Criterion Designmachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Same method familySingle-Case Experimental Designmachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.

Evidence status

Sources recorded, not reviewed

Bibliographic sources are present. Claim-level evidence review has not been performed.

Sources

2 recorded citations, copied from the method source record.

Actions

Open method page
ScholarGate

A content-first reference library for research methods — what each one is, how it works, and where it comes from.

Open data (CC-BY)

Explore

  • Library
  • Search the library…
  • Browse by field
  • Fields
  • Journey
  • Compare
  • Which method?

Reference

  • Subjects
  • Atlas
  • Glossary
  • Methodology
  • Philosophy

Your tools

  • Bookshelf
  • Desk
  • Chat

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Contact
  • Suggest a method

Entries are compiled from published sources for reference. Verifying the accuracy and suitability of any information for your own use remains your responsibility.

© 2026 ScholarGate · A research-method reference library
  • Privacy
  • Cookies
  • Terms
  • Delete account