Skip to contentScholarGate
LibraryBookshelfDeskReview StudioAssistant
Sign in
New York Heart Association Functional Classification/Evidence
Method evidence record

New York Heart Association Functional Classification

The New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Classification is a four-category ordinal system for grading heart failure severity based on the level of physical activity that precipitates dyspnea or other HF symptoms. Established by the NYHA in 1928 and refined in 1994, the NYHA classification is the oldest and most widely used functional status metric in cardiology, providing a simple, clinically intuitive framework for describing HF symptom burden, guiding treatment intensity, and predicting prognosis.

Sources recorded, not reviewed

Source record

Citations copied verbatim from the method’s source record. No claim-level verification is inferred from them.

New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Classification
Taxonomic method record · process-pipeline / cardiology
  • The Criteria Committee of the New York Heart Association. (1994). Nomenclature and Criteria for Diagnosis of Diseases of the Heart and Great Vessels (9th ed.). Little, Brown and Company. · URL
  • Dolgin, M. (for the Criteria Committee of the New York Heart Association). (1994). Nomenclature and criteria for diagnosis of diseases of the heart and great vessels. The Criteria Committee of the New York Heart Association. 9th ed. Boston, MA: Little, Brown. · URL
Open full method

Curated claims

Claims persisted in the evidence ledger, each with its own assessment.

No curated claims yet

This view does not invent a claim assessment when the ledger has none.

Related methods

Generated from the method graph and shown as machine-suggested relations — no evidence claim is inferred.

Same method familyBorg Dyspnea Scalemachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Same method familyDuke Activity Status Indexmachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Same method familyKansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnairemachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Same method familyMinnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnairemachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.

Evidence status

Sources recorded, not reviewed

Bibliographic sources are present. Claim-level evidence review has not been performed.

Sources

2 recorded citations, copied from the method source record.

Actions

Open method page
ScholarGate

A content-first reference library for research methods — what each one is, how it works, and where it comes from.

Open data (CC-BY)

Explore

  • Library
  • Search the library…
  • Browse by field
  • Fields
  • Journey
  • Compare
  • Which method?

Reference

  • Subjects
  • Atlas
  • Glossary
  • Methodology
  • Philosophy

Your tools

  • Bookshelf
  • Desk
  • Chat

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Contact
  • Suggest a method

Entries are compiled from published sources for reference. Verifying the accuracy and suitability of any information for your own use remains your responsibility.

© 2026 ScholarGate · A research-method reference library
  • Privacy
  • Cookies
  • Terms
  • Delete account