Skip to contentScholarGate
LibraryBookshelfDeskReview StudioAssistant
Sign in
NBD-Dirichlet Model/Evidence
Method evidence record

NBD-Dirichlet Model

The NBD-Dirichlet model is the canonical stochastic model of repeat buying and brand choice in stationary, competitive consumer-goods markets. Introduced by Gerald Goodhardt, Andrew Ehrenberg and Christopher Chatfield in their 1984 Journal of the Royal Statistical Society paper "The Dirichlet," it integrates two processes: how often households buy in a product category, modeled by the negative binomial distribution (NBD), and how those purchases are split across competing brands, modeled by a multinomial-Dirichlet process. From just a few parameters, the model reproduces a remarkably wide set of empirical regularities, including each brand's penetration (how many people buy it), its buyers' purchase frequency, repeat-purchase rates, the share of category requirements each brand earns, and the duplication of purchase between brands. The model encodes Ehrenberg's classic 'laws' of buying behavior, most famously double jeopardy, whereby small brands suffer twice over by having both fewer buyers and slightly less loyal buyers. It assumes a stationary, non-partitioned market with brand choice that looks like sampling 'as if from an urn,' and it serves as a benchmark of what normal, no-loyalty-segmentation buying looks like, against which deviations such as genuine partitioning or excess loyalty can be detected.

Sources recorded, not reviewed

Source record

Citations copied verbatim from the method’s source record. No claim-level verification is inferred from them.

NBD-Dirichlet Model of Repeat Buying and Brand Choice
Taxonomic method record · regression-model / marketing
  • Goodhardt, G. J., Ehrenberg, A. S. C., & Chatfield, C. (1984). The Dirichlet: A Comprehensive Model of Buying Behaviour. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A (General), 147(5), 621-655. · DOI 10.2307/2981696
Open full method

Curated claims

Claims persisted in the evidence ledger, each with its own assessment.

No curated claims yet

This view does not invent a claim assessment when the ledger has none.

Related methods

Generated from the method graph and shown as machine-suggested relations — no evidence claim is inferred.

Same method familyBG/NBD Modelmachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Used in the same domainCustomer Lifetime Valuemachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Used in the same domainRFM Analysismachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Used in the same domainShare of Wallet Analysismachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.

Evidence status

Sources recorded, not reviewed

Bibliographic sources are present. Claim-level evidence review has not been performed.

Sources

1 recorded citation, copied from the method source record.

Actions

Open method page
ScholarGate

A content-first reference library for research methods — what each one is, how it works, and where it comes from.

Open data (CC-BY)

Explore

  • Library
  • Search the library…
  • Browse by field
  • Fields
  • Journey
  • Compare
  • Which method?

Reference

  • Subjects
  • Atlas
  • Glossary
  • Methodology
  • Philosophy

Your tools

  • Bookshelf
  • Desk
  • Chat

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Contact
  • Suggest a method

Entries are compiled from published sources for reference. Verifying the accuracy and suitability of any information for your own use remains your responsibility.

© 2026 ScholarGate · A research-method reference library
  • Privacy
  • Cookies
  • Terms
  • Delete account