Skip to contentScholarGate
LibraryBookshelfDeskReview StudioAssistant
Sign in
Multi-response full factorial design/Evidence
Method evidence record

Multi-response full factorial design

Multi-response full factorial design extends the classic full factorial experiment by measuring and jointly optimizing two or more response variables at the same time. Every combination of all factor levels is tested, providing complete main-effect and interaction information for each response. A desirability function or Pareto-front approach then reconciles competing responses into a single optimal factor setting, making this the method of choice when engineering or process goals involve trade-offs among several quality characteristics simultaneously.

Sources recorded, not reviewed

Source record

Citations copied verbatim from the method’s source record. No claim-level verification is inferred from them.

Multi-Response Full Factorial Design of Experiments
Taxonomic method record · process-pipeline / experimental-design
  • Montgomery, D. C. (2017). Design and Analysis of Experiments (9th ed.). Wiley. · ISBN 978-1119492443
  • Derringer, G., & Suich, R. (1980). Simultaneous optimization of several response variables. Journal of Quality Technology, 12(4), 214–219. · DOI 10.1080/00224065.1980.11980968
Open full method

Curated claims

Claims persisted in the evidence ledger, each with its own assessment.

No curated claims yet

This view does not invent a claim assessment when the ledger has none.

Related methods

Generated from the method graph and shown as machine-suggested relations — no evidence claim is inferred.

Taxonomic bucketDesign of experimentsmachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Taxonomic bucketMulti-response Response Surface Methodologymachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Used in the same domainResponse Surface Methodologymachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.

Evidence status

Sources recorded, not reviewed

Bibliographic sources are present. Claim-level evidence review has not been performed.

Sources

2 recorded citations, copied from the method source record.

Actions

Open method page
ScholarGate

A content-first reference library for research methods — what each one is, how it works, and where it comes from.

Open data (CC-BY)

Explore

  • Library
  • Search the library…
  • Browse by field
  • Fields
  • Journey
  • Compare
  • Which method?

Reference

  • Subjects
  • Atlas
  • Glossary
  • Methodology
  • Philosophy

Your tools

  • Bookshelf
  • Desk
  • Chat

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Contact
  • Suggest a method

Entries are compiled from published sources for reference. Verifying the accuracy and suitability of any information for your own use remains your responsibility.

© 2026 ScholarGate · A research-method reference library
  • Privacy
  • Cookies
  • Terms
  • Delete account