Multi-group content validity
Multi-group content validity extends the standard content validity index (CVI) procedure by computing and comparing item- and scale-level validity indices across two or more distinct expert panels or subgroups. It ensures that a scale's items are judged as relevant and representative not only overall but also within each subgroup of interest, supporting cross-group generalizability of the instrument.
Source record
Citations copied verbatim from the method’s source record. No claim-level verification is inferred from them.
- Polit, D. F. & Beck, C. T. (2006). The content validity index: Are you sure you know what's being reported? Critique and recommendations. Research in Nursing & Health, 29(5), 489–497. · DOI 10.1002/nur.20147
- Lynn, M. R. (1986). Determination and quantification of content validity. Nursing Research, 35(6), 382–385. · DOI 10.1097/00006199-198611000-00017
Curated claims
Claims persisted in the evidence ledger, each with its own assessment.
This view does not invent a claim assessment when the ledger has none.
Related methods
Generated from the method graph and shown as machine-suggested relations — no evidence claim is inferred.