Motivated Reasoning Experiment
A motivated reasoning experiment tests whether people process political information to reach conclusions they are directionally motivated to hold rather than the most accurate ones. Building on Kunda's (1990) theory and crystallized by Taber and Lodge (2006), these designs expose partisans to attitude-congruent and incongruent arguments and measure biased assimilation, disconfirmation bias, attitude polarization, and selective exposure.
Source record
Citations copied verbatim from the method’s source record. No claim-level verification is inferred from them.
- Taber, C. S., & Lodge, M. (2006). Motivated skepticism in the evaluation of political beliefs. American Journal of Political Science, 50(3), 755-769. · DOI 10.1111/j.1540-5907.2006.00214.x
- Kunda, Z. (1990). The case for motivated reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 108(3), 480-498. · DOI 10.1037/0033-2909.108.3.480
Curated claims
Claims persisted in the evidence ledger, each with its own assessment.
This view does not invent a claim assessment when the ledger has none.
Related methods
Generated from the method graph and shown as machine-suggested relations — no evidence claim is inferred.