Skip to contentScholarGate
LibraryBookshelfDeskReview StudioAssistant
Sign in
Moser Gender Planning Framework/Evidence
Method evidence record

Moser Gender Planning Framework

The Moser Gender Planning Framework, developed by Caroline Moser at the Development Planning Unit in London in the late 1980s, treats gender planning as a distinct planning discipline in its own right and as an inherently political activity. Built on three core concepts — the triple role of women (productive, reproductive, and community-managing work), the distinction between practical and strategic gender needs, and a policy matrix charting Women in Development and Gender and Development approaches — it aims not merely to make women visible but to emancipate them from subordination and transform unequal gender relations.

Sources recorded, not reviewed

Source record

Citations copied verbatim from the method’s source record. No claim-level verification is inferred from them.

Moser Gender Planning Framework
Taxonomic method record · process-pipeline / gender-studies
  • Moser, C. O. N. (1993). Gender Planning and Development: Theory, Practice and Training. Routledge, London. · ISBN 9780415056212
  • Moser, C. O. N. (1989). Gender planning in the Third World: Meeting practical and strategic gender needs. World Development, 17(11), 1799–1825. · DOI 10.1016/0305-750X(89)90201-5
Open full method

Curated claims

Claims persisted in the evidence ledger, each with its own assessment.

No curated claims yet

This view does not invent a claim assessment when the ledger has none.

Related methods

Generated from the method graph and shown as machine-suggested relations — no evidence claim is inferred.

Same method familyGender Budgeting Analysismachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Same method familyGender Mainstreaming Assessmentmachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Taxonomic bucketHarvard Gender Analysis Frameworkmachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Taxonomic bucketSocial Relations Approachmachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.

Evidence status

Sources recorded, not reviewed

Bibliographic sources are present. Claim-level evidence review has not been performed.

Sources

2 recorded citations, copied from the method source record.

Actions

Open method page
ScholarGate

A content-first reference library for research methods — what each one is, how it works, and where it comes from.

Open data (CC-BY)

Explore

  • Library
  • Search the library…
  • Browse by field
  • Fields
  • Journey
  • Compare
  • Which method?

Reference

  • Subjects
  • Atlas
  • Glossary
  • Methodology
  • Philosophy

Your tools

  • Bookshelf
  • Desk
  • Chat

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Contact
  • Suggest a method

Entries are compiled from published sources for reference. Verifying the accuracy and suitability of any information for your own use remains your responsibility.

© 2026 ScholarGate · A research-method reference library
  • Privacy
  • Cookies
  • Terms
  • Delete account