Meta-analytic cross-sectional epidemiological study
A meta-analytic cross-sectional epidemiological study systematically identifies and statistically pools prevalence or proportion estimates from multiple independent cross-sectional surveys. By combining data across studies — often using variance-stabilising transformations and random-effects models — it produces a more precise and generalisable estimate of disease burden, risk-factor frequency, or health behaviour prevalence in a defined population.
Source record
Citations copied verbatim from the method’s source record. No claim-level verification is inferred from them.
- Barendregt, J. J., Doi, S. A., Lee, Y. Y., Norman, R. E., & Vos, T. (2013). Meta-analysis of prevalence. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 67(11), 974-978. · DOI 10.1136/jech-2013-203104
- Higgins, J. P. T., Thomas, J., Chandler, J., Cumpston, M., Li, T., Page, M. J., & Welch, V. A. (Eds.). (2019). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2nd ed.). Wiley-Blackwell. · ISBN 978-1119536956
Curated claims
Claims persisted in the evidence ledger, each with its own assessment.
This view does not invent a claim assessment when the ledger has none.
Related methods
Generated from the method graph and shown as machine-suggested relations — no evidence claim is inferred.
The generated relation graph has no outgoing relation for this method.