Skip to contentScholarGate
LibraryBookshelfDeskReview StudioAssistant
Sign in
Machine learning-augmented doubly robust estimation/Evidence
Method evidence record

Machine learning-augmented doubly robust estimation

Machine learning-augmented doubly robust (ML-DR) estimation combines the classical doubly robust (AIPW) identification strategy with flexible machine learning models for the nuisance functions — the propensity score and the outcome regression. The result is a causal estimator that is consistent if either ML component is correctly specified, and that achieves valid, root-n inference even when the nuisance models are estimated with high-dimensional regularisation or nonparametric learners.

Sources recorded, not reviewed

Source record

Citations copied verbatim from the method’s source record. No claim-level verification is inferred from them.

Machine Learning-Augmented Doubly Robust Estimation
Taxonomic method record · regression-model / causal-inference
  • Chernozhukov, V., Chetverikov, D., Demirer, M., Duflo, E., Hansen, C., Newey, W., & Robins, J. (2018). Double/debiased machine learning for treatment and structural parameters. The Econometrics Journal, 21(1), C1-C68. · DOI 10.1111/ectj.12097
  • Farrell, M. H., Liang, T., & Misra, S. (2021). Deep Neural Networks for Estimation and Inference. Econometrica, 89(1), 181-213. · DOI 10.3982/ECTA16901
Open full method

Curated claims

Claims persisted in the evidence ledger, each with its own assessment.

No curated claims yet

This view does not invent a claim assessment when the ledger has none.

Related methods

Generated from the method graph and shown as machine-suggested relations — no evidence claim is inferred.

Same method familyDifference-in-Differencesmachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Same method familyDoubly Robust Estimationmachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Same method familyInverse Probability Weightingmachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Taxonomic bucketMachine Learning-Augmented Propensity Score Matchingmachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Taxonomic bucketMarginal Structural Modelmachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Taxonomic bucketPropensity Score Weightingmachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.

Evidence status

Sources recorded, not reviewed

Bibliographic sources are present. Claim-level evidence review has not been performed.

Sources

2 recorded citations, copied from the method source record.

Actions

Open method page
ScholarGate

A content-first reference library for research methods — what each one is, how it works, and where it comes from.

Open data (CC-BY)

Explore

  • Library
  • Search the library…
  • Browse by field
  • Fields
  • Journey
  • Compare
  • Which method?

Reference

  • Subjects
  • Atlas
  • Glossary
  • Methodology
  • Philosophy

Your tools

  • Bookshelf
  • Desk
  • Chat

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Contact
  • Suggest a method

Entries are compiled from published sources for reference. Verifying the accuracy and suitability of any information for your own use remains your responsibility.

© 2026 ScholarGate · A research-method reference library
  • Privacy
  • Cookies
  • Terms
  • Delete account