Skip to contentScholarGate
LibraryBookshelfDeskReview StudioAssistant
Sign in
Single-Aliquot Regenerative-Dose (SAR) Protocol/Evidence
Method evidence record

Single-Aliquot Regenerative-Dose (SAR) Protocol

The single-aliquot regenerative-dose (SAR) protocol is the measurement methodology that underlies modern optically stimulated luminescence (OSL) dating, providing the recipe by which the equivalent dose of a sediment sample is estimated from a single sub-sample. Its central problem is that exposing a mineral grain to light and radiation in the laboratory changes how brightly it luminesces, so a naive comparison of natural and laboratory signals is biased. Murray and Wintle's protocol solves this by measuring, after every luminescence readout, the response to a fixed small 'test dose' and using it to normalize for sensitivity change, so that natural and regenerated signals can be compared on a common footing. The aliquot's natural signal is then interpolated onto a regeneration growth curve to read off the equivalent dose, and a suite of internal checks — recycling, recuperation, and dose recovery — verifies that the procedure behaved correctly. Because the entire measurement is done on one aliquot, the protocol is efficient, reproducible, and the de facto standard for quartz OSL.

Sources recorded, not reviewed

Source record

Citations copied verbatim from the method’s source record. No claim-level verification is inferred from them.

Single-Aliquot Regenerative-Dose (SAR) Protocol for Luminescence Dating
Taxonomic method record · process-pipeline / archaeology
  • Murray, A. S., & Wintle, A. G. (2000). Luminescence Dating of Quartz Using an Improved Single-Aliquot Regenerative-Dose Protocol. Radiation Measurements, 32(1), 57-73. · DOI 10.1016/S1350-4487(99)00253-X
Open full method

Curated claims

Claims persisted in the evidence ledger, each with its own assessment.

No curated claims yet

This view does not invent a claim assessment when the ledger has none.

Related methods

Generated from the method graph and shown as machine-suggested relations — no evidence claim is inferred.

Often confused withAmino Acid Racemizationmachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Used in the same domainBayesian Chronological Modelingmachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Used in the same domainPotassium-Argon Datingmachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.

Evidence status

Sources recorded, not reviewed

Bibliographic sources are present. Claim-level evidence review has not been performed.

Sources

1 recorded citation, copied from the method source record.

Actions

Open method page
ScholarGate

A content-first reference library for research methods — what each one is, how it works, and where it comes from.

Open data (CC-BY)

Explore

  • Library
  • Search the library…
  • Browse by field
  • Fields
  • Journey
  • Compare
  • Which method?

Reference

  • Subjects
  • Atlas
  • Glossary
  • Methodology
  • Philosophy

Your tools

  • Bookshelf
  • Desk
  • Chat

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Contact
  • Suggest a method

Entries are compiled from published sources for reference. Verifying the accuracy and suitability of any information for your own use remains your responsibility.

© 2026 ScholarGate · A research-method reference library
  • Privacy
  • Cookies
  • Terms
  • Delete account