Leisure Constraints Negotiation Model
The leisure constraints negotiation model studies how people who encounter obstacles to participation do not simply abstain but instead deploy strategies that allow them to take part anyway, often in modified form. Building on Crawford, Jackson and Godbey's tripartite classification of constraints into intrapersonal, interpersonal, and structural types, Jackson, Crawford and Godbey's 1993 paper overturned the prevailing assumption that constraints are insurmountable barriers, arguing instead that participation is the outcome of a negotiation process in which motivation and effort can offset constraint. Hubbard and Mannell's 2001 study formalized this insight by pitting four competing models of the constraint-negotiation process against one another with structural equation modeling, establishing the constraint-effects-mitigation model as the dominant account. The framework reframes non-participation as just one possible endpoint of an active negotiation rather than the inevitable consequence of facing a constraint.
Source record
Citations copied verbatim from the method’s source record. No claim-level verification is inferred from them.
- Jackson, E. L., Crawford, D. W., & Godbey, G. (1993). Negotiation of leisure constraints. Leisure Sciences, 15(1), 1-11. · DOI 10.1080/01490409309513182
- Hubbard, J., & Mannell, R. C. (2001). Testing competing models of the leisure constraint negotiation process in a corporate employee recreation setting. Leisure Sciences, 23(3), 145-163. · DOI 10.1080/014904001316896846
- Crawford, D. W., Jackson, E. L., & Godbey, G. (1991). A hierarchical model of leisure constraints. Leisure Sciences, 13(4), 309-320. · DOI 10.1080/01490409109513147
Curated claims
Claims persisted in the evidence ledger, each with its own assessment.
This view does not invent a claim assessment when the ledger has none.
Related methods
Generated from the method graph and shown as machine-suggested relations — no evidence claim is inferred.