Skip to contentScholarGate
LibraryBookshelfDeskReview StudioAssistant
Sign in
Icon Usability Testing/Evidence
Method evidence record

Icon Usability Testing

Icon Usability Testing is a systematic method for evaluating how well users understand the meaning of graphical icons and symbols. By combining comprehension testing, task performance measurement, and preference assessment, this pipeline ensures that icons effectively communicate their intended functions across diverse user populations.

Sources recorded, not reviewed

Source record

Citations copied verbatim from the method’s source record. No claim-level verification is inferred from them.

Icon Usability Testing
Taxonomic method record · process-pipeline / visual-arts
  • Blenkhorn, P., & Evans, G. (1994). Investigations into the Comprehension of Symbolic Road Behaviour Displays using Icon-like Pictorial Symbols. Displays, 15(2), 87–97. · URL
  • McGinley, C., Fonseca, B., Curry, R., Goodman-Deane, J., & Clarkson, J. (2015). From Retro to Retinal: Evaluating Smartphone Icon Comprehensibility. In S. Miesenberger, et al. (Eds.), Computers Helping People with Special Needs. Springer. · URL
  • Hurtienne, J., Israel, J. H., & Weber, K. (2005). Cooking the Perfect Fit Just Right: HCI Cooking and Iterative Recipes for Usability Engineering in Software Projects. In INTERACT 2005. Springer. · URL
Open full method

Curated claims

Claims persisted in the evidence ledger, each with its own assessment.

No curated claims yet

This view does not invent a claim assessment when the ledger has none.

Related methods

Generated from the method graph and shown as machine-suggested relations — no evidence claim is inferred.

Same method familyColor Harmony Analysismachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Same method familyContrast Ratio Measurementmachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Same method familyGestalt Principles Analysismachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Same method familyTypography Legibility Testingmachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Same method familyVisual Saliency Mappingmachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.

Evidence status

Sources recorded, not reviewed

Bibliographic sources are present. Claim-level evidence review has not been performed.

Sources

3 recorded citations, copied from the method source record.

Actions

Open method page
ScholarGate

A content-first reference library for research methods — what each one is, how it works, and where it comes from.

Open data (CC-BY)

Explore

  • Library
  • Search the library…
  • Browse by field
  • Fields
  • Journey
  • Compare
  • Which method?

Reference

  • Subjects
  • Atlas
  • Glossary
  • Methodology
  • Philosophy

Your tools

  • Bookshelf
  • Desk
  • Chat

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Contact
  • Suggest a method

Entries are compiled from published sources for reference. Verifying the accuracy and suitability of any information for your own use remains your responsibility.

© 2026 ScholarGate · A research-method reference library
  • Privacy
  • Cookies
  • Terms
  • Delete account