Skip to contentScholarGate
LibraryBookshelfDeskReview StudioAssistant
Sign in
Hierarchical Bayes Choice Model/Evidence
Method evidence record

Hierarchical Bayes Choice Model

Hierarchical Bayes (HB) choice models estimate a separate set of preference weights — partworths — for every individual respondent, while borrowing strength across respondents through a shared population distribution. The model has two levels: at the lower level each person's choices follow a logit driven by their own coefficients, and at the upper level those individual coefficients are treated as draws from a common multivariate distribution whose mean and covariance are themselves estimated. Inference is Bayesian and proceeds by Markov chain Monte Carlo — typically Gibbs sampling with Metropolis steps — which yields a full posterior for each respondent's partworths rather than a single point estimate. The approach, codified by Rossi, Allenby, and McCulloch, solved a long-standing problem in choice modeling: how to recover genuine individual-level heterogeneity from the sparse data each person provides. Sparse individual estimates are stabilized by shrinkage toward the population mean, giving reliable person-level coefficients usable for segmentation, targeting, and realistic market simulation. HB is now the default estimator for conjoint and scanner-based choice analysis.

Sources recorded, not reviewed

Source record

Citations copied verbatim from the method’s source record. No claim-level verification is inferred from them.

Hierarchical Bayes (HB) Choice Models for Individual-Level Partworths
Taxonomic method record · regression-model / marketing
  • Rossi, P. E., Allenby, G. M., & McCulloch, R. (2005). Bayesian Statistics and Marketing. John Wiley & Sons. · ISBN 9780470863671
  • Guadagni, P. M., & Little, J. D. C. (1983). A Logit Model of Brand Choice Calibrated on Scanner Data. Marketing Science, 2(3), 203-238. · DOI 10.1287/mksc.2.3.203
Open full method

Curated claims

Claims persisted in the evidence ledger, each with its own assessment.

No curated claims yet

This view does not invent a claim assessment when the ledger has none.

Related methods

Generated from the method graph and shown as machine-suggested relations — no evidence claim is inferred.

Same method familyConsideration-Set Modelmachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Same method familyNested Logit Brand Choicemachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Same method familyScanner Panel Analysismachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.

Evidence status

Sources recorded, not reviewed

Bibliographic sources are present. Claim-level evidence review has not been performed.

Sources

2 recorded citations, copied from the method source record.

Actions

Open method page
ScholarGate

A content-first reference library for research methods — what each one is, how it works, and where it comes from.

Open data (CC-BY)

Explore

  • Library
  • Search the library…
  • Browse by field
  • Fields
  • Journey
  • Compare
  • Which method?

Reference

  • Subjects
  • Atlas
  • Glossary
  • Methodology
  • Philosophy

Your tools

  • Bookshelf
  • Desk
  • Chat

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Contact
  • Suggest a method

Entries are compiled from published sources for reference. Verifying the accuracy and suitability of any information for your own use remains your responsibility.

© 2026 ScholarGate · A research-method reference library
  • Privacy
  • Cookies
  • Terms
  • Delete account