Skip to contentScholarGate
LibraryBookshelfDeskReview StudioAssistant
Sign in
HF-COPRAS/Evidence
Method evidence record

HF-COPRAS

HF-COPRAS (Hesitant Fuzzy Complex Proportional Assessment) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Mishra, A.R., Rani, P., Pardasani, K.R. in 2018. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.

Sources recorded, not reviewed

Source record

Citations copied verbatim from the method’s source record. No claim-level verification is inferred from them.

Hesitant Fuzzy Complex Proportional Assessment
Taxonomic method record · mcdm / decision-making
  • Mishra, A.R., Rani, P., Pardasani, K.R. (2018). Multiple-criteria decision-making for service quality selection based on Shapley COPRAS method under hesitant fuzzy sets. Granular Computing · DOI 10.1007/s41066-018-0103-8
Open full method

Curated claims

Claims persisted in the evidence ledger, each with its own assessment.

No curated claims yet

This view does not invent a claim assessment when the ledger has none.

Related methods

Generated from the method graph and shown as machine-suggested relations — no evidence claim is inferred.

No related methods yet

The generated relation graph has no outgoing relation for this method.

Evidence status

Sources recorded, not reviewed

Bibliographic sources are present. Claim-level evidence review has not been performed.

Sources

1 recorded citation, copied from the method source record.

Actions

Open method page
ScholarGate

A content-first reference library for research methods — what each one is, how it works, and where it comes from.

Open data (CC-BY)

Explore

  • Library
  • Search the library…
  • Browse by field
  • Fields
  • Journey
  • Compare
  • Which method?

Reference

  • Subjects
  • Atlas
  • Glossary
  • Methodology
  • Philosophy

Your tools

  • Bookshelf
  • Desk
  • Chat

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Contact
  • Suggest a method

Entries are compiled from published sources for reference. Verifying the accuracy and suitability of any information for your own use remains your responsibility.

© 2026 ScholarGate · A research-method reference library
  • Privacy
  • Cookies
  • Terms
  • Delete account