Skip to contentScholarGate
LibraryBookshelfDeskReview StudioAssistant
Sign in
Hatemi-J Asymmetric Causality/Evidence
Method evidence record

Hatemi-J Asymmetric Causality

The Hatemi-J asymmetric causality test, introduced by Abdulnasser Hatemi-J in 2012, extends the Granger causality framework to allow causal relationships between the positive and negative components of integrated time series to differ. By decomposing each series into cumulative positive and negative partial sums and embedding the Toda-Yamamoto approach within a VAR, the test enables researchers to distinguish whether positive shocks, negative shocks, or both drive causation between economic variables.

Sources recorded, not reviewed

Source record

Citations copied verbatim from the method’s source record. No claim-level verification is inferred from them.

Hatemi-J Asymmetric Causality Test
Taxonomic method record · hypothesis-test / econometrics
  • Hatemi-J, A. (2012). Asymmetric causality tests with an application. Empirical Economics, 43(1), 447–456. · DOI 10.1007/s00181-011-0484-x
Open full method

Curated claims

Claims persisted in the evidence ledger, each with its own assessment.

No curated claims yet

This view does not invent a claim assessment when the ledger has none.

Related methods

Generated from the method graph and shown as machine-suggested relations — no evidence claim is inferred.

Used in the same domainGranger Causalitymachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Same method familyHatemi-J Cointegration Testmachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Taxonomic bucketToda-Yamamoto Causalitymachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.

Evidence status

Sources recorded, not reviewed

Bibliographic sources are present. Claim-level evidence review has not been performed.

Sources

1 recorded citation, copied from the method source record.

Actions

Open method page
ScholarGate

A content-first reference library for research methods — what each one is, how it works, and where it comes from.

Open data (CC-BY)

Explore

  • Library
  • Search the library…
  • Browse by field
  • Fields
  • Journey
  • Compare
  • Which method?

Reference

  • Subjects
  • Atlas
  • Glossary
  • Methodology
  • Philosophy

Your tools

  • Bookshelf
  • Desk
  • Chat

Company

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Contact
  • Suggest a method

Entries are compiled from published sources for reference. Verifying the accuracy and suitability of any information for your own use remains your responsibility.

© 2026 ScholarGate · A research-method reference library
  • Privacy
  • Cookies
  • Terms
  • Delete account